Hard Light Productions Forums

General FreeSpace => FreeSpace Discussion => Topic started by: Hippo on June 04, 2002, 02:12:38 pm

Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Hippo on June 04, 2002, 02:12:38 pm
Does anyone know if Descent 3 happened during the freespace timeframe? Like: after FreeSpace 1 and sepreated from everyone else?
Or: During FS2 but still isolated?
Or: Before FS1
Or:
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Bri_Dog on June 04, 2002, 02:19:05 pm
Are they even supposed to happen in the same universe:wtf:
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Alikchi on June 04, 2002, 02:34:44 pm
Descent was just tacked on to the original FreeSpace, I don't know why. They aren't the same universe.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Unknown Target on June 04, 2002, 02:43:39 pm
It was done for marketing reasons, because Descent sold well in the US. In Europe, the opposite happened, so they changed it to Conflict: Freespace; The Great War
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Killfrenzy on June 04, 2002, 03:55:51 pm
Yep, then dropped both of them for FreeSpace 2........
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Fineus on June 04, 2002, 04:30:13 pm
Yep, and although at first glance it's possible to merge them they do infact have features which negate the other universe. Most namely the alien virus in Descent (which would infect and FS ship one would assume). As well as the Pyro in Descent 2 being fitted with a warp drive for the jump to Zeta Aquila for the recon missions (which is far more efficient than subspace).

So, no. It wouldn't work.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Nico on June 04, 2002, 05:07:07 pm
you could argue that the virus only had a very localized area of effect, and that the warp drive is a PTMC super secret and unique device. Anyway, for various reasons, I'm pretty sure they have notthing in common ( the GTVA isn't ruled by the PTMC as far as I know, for exemple, and the tech in descent is infinitely more evolved, too ). A funny detail, tho: guess how is called the main PTMC station around earth?
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 04, 2002, 05:16:28 pm
Descent isn't related to Freespace in the slightest.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: IceFire on June 04, 2002, 10:03:03 pm
Venom: PTMC Shiva....I know....the V guys were into mythology way back then too.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Ulundel on June 05, 2002, 03:07:02 am
Quote
Originally posted by MD-2389
Descent isn't related to Freespace in the slightest.


Oh really? ;7
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 05, 2002, 01:15:03 pm
Yes, really.

Nowhere in either Freespace titles was PTMC or the Material Defender ever mentioned.  Furthermore, nowhere in any of the 3 descents is the GTA ever mentioned.  Earths military is the CED, not GTA.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Bri_Dog on June 05, 2002, 01:17:49 pm
Do they ever mention the date in the Descent  games? It could be in the FS universe but many many years later.


probably not though
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Petrarch of the VBB on June 05, 2002, 01:24:11 pm
Dont you just love pointless subtitles?
What wrong with Conflict: Freespace?
No! It has to be Conflict: Freespace: The Great War
Or Operation Flashpoint?
No! It's Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis.
Not to mention Acanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura!
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Fineus on June 05, 2002, 04:16:10 pm
[Parody]

It's like they say things that just don't need to be said. I mean take this timeless classic example...

Thunder:The Most Amazing Man On The Planet

I mean, everyone knows the statement is true so why say it? It's a waste of space!

[/Parody]
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Hippo on June 05, 2002, 05:08:50 pm
D3 could have been after FS1, thus only in SOL...
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Galemp on June 05, 2002, 05:28:06 pm
I think there's a good chance the events of the Descent series could be between FS1 and FS2. The rise of corporations after the collapse of the Earth-based GTA fits well, and the CED probably arose from that threat. Technology seems to be at a similar level with Freespace 2, but on a different course. Note the CED Expediator in D3; missle tubes! A good chance of how Solar military technology evolved instead of beams.
As for the warp drive in D2, how did PTMC get to those systems anyway? It's possible those systems weren't linked by jump nodes to the rest of the galaxy so it would be impossible to get military forces or colonisation there. PTMC must have used its warp tech to set up bases in Zeta Aquilae, Brimspark, and the Limefrost Spiral without the GTA's knowledge or intervention.

I'm really disappointed that there weren't any crossover ships or weapons. Why can't somebody make the Pyro, Phoenix, and Magnum in FS2? :( The only hint we get is that the Synaptic bomb in FS1 was nicknamed the "Earthshaker" according to the tech description. There was actually a great opportunity for crossover in Red Faction, too; for Ultor, read: PTMC. Makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Particularly when there is a bloody mining revolt mentioned in the first Descent 1 briefing, which Material Defender apparently had a large part in. Since RF was originally going to be D4, a prequel, methinks Parker was our very own Descent pilot, but all references to Descent probably had to be changed because Outrage's distributor owned the rights.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Tar-Palantir on June 06, 2002, 05:34:37 am
I seemed to remember reading somewhere that the Descent/Conflict part was stuck on to get round the fact that 'Freespace' was alread copywrited to some disk compression utility. After trying some different names, some of which apparently were pretty bad, they ended up sticking Descent/Conflict on before the name for the reasons stated above. Thus copywrite wasn't broken.

I guess copywrite wasn't broken by sticking s '2' after the name.

Just one question to those agueeing that Descent and Freespace could have tken place in the same universe. If they had, why the hell was the game called Conflict:Freespace outside the US? That would have annoyed quite a few people would it not?
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: karajorma on June 06, 2002, 06:32:28 am
Quote
Originally posted by Tar-Palantir
Just one question to those agueeing that Descent and Freespace could have tken place in the same universe. If they had, why the hell was the game called Conflict:Freespace outside the US? That would have annoyed quite a few people would it not?


Perhaps a lot of the non-english speaking countries were reading it as decent freespace and thinking "Well I`d spend money on good freespace or excellent freespace but I can`t afford decent freespace" :D
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Bri_Dog on June 06, 2002, 10:37:29 am
What I heard is that :v: was going to call subsapce freespace. They put conflict on it to say that it was a war over freespace or subspace. They should have called it Conflict here in the US also.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Nico on June 06, 2002, 12:19:57 pm
They didn't put descent coz descent in europe sold bad. It's just marketing stuff.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Petrarch of the VBB on June 06, 2002, 12:23:50 pm
Quote
Originally posted by karajorma


Perhaps a lot of the non-english speaking countries were reading it as decent freespace and thinking "Well I`d spend money on good freespace or excellent freespace but I can`t afford decent freespace" :D


This could be very true, a mate of mine thought for months that the game was called Decent, and that it was a shameless marketing ploy, like calling the game "Amazing" or something.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Kellan on June 06, 2002, 03:16:02 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Thunder
[Parody]
Thunder:The Most Amazing Man On The Planet
[/Parody]


Which part was a parody? This bit most certainly was. :lol:

If it was not, I would take issue with almost every single word of that sentence. :p
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 06, 2002, 04:14:45 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Bri_Dog
Do they ever mention the date in the Descent  games? It could be in the FS universe but many many years later.


Yes, they do somewhat in the D2 intro.

We do know that Descent atleast takes place in the 22nd century.  

"I thought endentured servitude ended in the 21st century" - MD-1032 (aka Vertigo1)

Furthermore, there are zero ties to the Freespace universe.  No vessel makes use of jump nodes.  No vessel is armed with beam cannons.  No mention of the shivans at all.

Notice that no mention is made of the 'alien virus' anywhere in Freespace 1 or 2.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: beatspete on June 06, 2002, 04:55:40 pm
Well i only had decent one, (in which i spent many a happy hour seeing how long i could charge the fusion (or plasma) cannon for), but i'd say it has nothing to do with freespace.

pete
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: SlipStream on June 07, 2002, 02:47:09 am
Quote
They didn't put descent coz descent in europe sold bad. It's just marketing stuff.


Ah,  now that part makes sence. I was wondering why they didn't put Descent in fromt or around Freespace 2.   That is a suprise to me. :jaw:     It never even dawned on me to look at that part of the cover on the game.   :doh:




Quote
A daimond can't be polished without friction, nor a man without trials..
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Petrarch of the VBB on June 07, 2002, 01:04:47 pm
Quote
Originally posted by beatspete
Well i only had decent one

pete


Another one calling it decent, it can't have been that good, surely?
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 08, 2002, 06:29:03 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Petrarch of th VBB


Another one calling it decent, it can't have been that good, surely?


:D
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Silver_Scythe on June 08, 2002, 08:25:21 pm
Quote
Originally posted by MD-2389
Yes, really.

Nowhere in either Freespace titles was PTMC or the Material Defender ever mentioned.  Furthermore, nowhere in any of the 3 descents is the GTA ever mentioned.  Earths military is the CED, not GTA.

Hmm I just had a funny idea. What if you found your way back to earth in a new campaign and found that the D3 world had developed? Just a thought...
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 10, 2002, 01:15:51 am
Thats not a bad idea actually.  The models of the D3 ships have been available for ages (minus .tbl entries).....why not use em for something like that?
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Galemp on June 10, 2002, 09:55:57 am
Quote
Originally posted by MD-2389
The models of the D3 ships have been available for ages (minus .tbl entries).....



:eek: WHAT?!
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 10, 2002, 01:02:54 pm
Quote
Originally posted by GalacticEmperor



:eek: WHAT?!


Uhh,  yeah.  There's a frelling thread about them. (which the author of pointed me to rather....rudely.)
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Vertigo1 on June 10, 2002, 01:05:24 pm
http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,305.0.html

There
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Nico on June 11, 2002, 01:56:34 am
Quote
Originally posted by MD-2389
http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,305.0.html

There


oh, I see what it has been bumped...
her, anyway:
 " which the author of pointed me to rather....rudely."
WTF? never talked with you about that.
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: Hippo on June 11, 2002, 02:48:26 pm
Quote
Originally posted by MD-2389


Furthermore, there are zero ties to the Freespace universe.  No vessel makes use of jump nodes.  No vessel is armed with beam cannons.  No mention of the shivans at all.


Beam cannons were after fs1, so they had never been seen in SOL because you couldn't get there, except there were multiple nodes to earth, but supposedly they all closed. The Virus could be AFTER the GTA lost contact...
Title: Descent3/Freespace timeframe
Post by: killadonuts on June 12, 2002, 11:43:53 pm
The fact that FS1 had the name "Descent" led to my downloading the original demo.
I instantly fell in love with this game and here I am still playing it. (But of course I eventually bought it :D)

Putting Descent on the title was a wise decision. At least for the US market.
I wouldn't have even known about a  Conflict: Freespace if it had been named that here in the US