Originally posted by Dr.Zer0
err, thats all they have now, little retarded sucides :mad:
why dont they ever try anything smart, STOP killing your self just to kill harmless poeple
Originally posted by Infested_Larva
They probably doesn't have enought money for computer games... And the are thirsty for action...(Play bloody computer games... It will make you friendlier)
Now i'm going back to SoF2:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Infested_Larva
They probably doesn't have enought money for computer games... And the are thirsty for action...(Play bloody computer games... It will make you friendlier)
Now i'm going back to SoF2:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Styxx
Damn... Well, good to hear you're fine, or else I'd have to go to Israel and finish this damn thing off myself. :D
Originally posted by Kellan
Yeah, that would be a pretty final solution to the conflict... :o
Originally posted by GalacticEmperor
Will the horror never end?
Originally posted by an0n
*un-nervingly strokes nuclear weapons controls*
Soon my pretties. Soon.......
Originally posted by aldo_14
It's not hard to find a reason for wiping them out.... i guess you have to applaud Israels restraint in this case, in not doing exactly that.
Originally posted by an0n
(http://www.fattonys.com/images/billysm.jpg)
:D
Originally posted by an0n
(http://www.fattonys.com/images/final.gif)(http://www.fattonys.com/images/billysm.jpg)
:D
Originally posted by Dr.Zer0Nope. Cause macs suck. :p
Dose that make Macintosh and Linux the allies ;)
Originally posted by Shrike
Nope. Cause macs suck. :p
Originally posted by Shrike
Nope. Cause macs suck. :p
Originally posted by Thorn
Having used both... no.. they dont suck, theyre great multimedia machines... if I didnt play games all that much I'd be using a Mac...
Originally posted by sandwich
A couple of you mentioned building a wall/fence - a plan that Israel is actually taking first steps in.
But the problem with this "solution" is three-fold:
1. Thousands of Israelis live in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. It'd sort of be like walling off the Bronx.
2. If the Palestinians were left to fend for themselves, economy-wise, they'd shrivel away and die. Arafat, instead of directing the money he recieves from international aid towards helping the Palestinians, invests in the terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah, or "rewards" the families of suicide bombers for the sacrifice of their son/daughter.
3. There is an international border between Israel and Egypt. But that hasn't prevented the smuggling of weaponry across the border, via tunnels primarily. So in the end, what good would yet another wall/fence be?
Originally posted by an0n
I think it's funny how it's gotten to be that even tiny little incidents can escalate to the brink of world annihilation.
But the attempt to force the media to obey Israel's rules is now international. We must say that Israel is under siege by Palestinians (rather than occupying Palestinian land), that Palestinians are responsible for the violence (even though Palestinians are the principal victims), that Arafat turned down a good deal at Camp David (though he was offered just over 60 per cent of his land, not 94 per cent), and that Palestinians indulge in child sacrifice (rather than question why the Israeli troops have shot so many Palestinian children).
Oddly, you can now learn more from the Israeli press than the American media. The brutality of Israeli soldiers is fully covered in Ha'aretz, which also reports on the large number of US negotiators who are Jewish. Four years ago, a former Israeli soldier described in an Israeli newspaper how his men had looted a village in southern Lebanon; when the piece was reprinted in The New York Times, the looting episode was censored out of the text.
There are enough popular sites on the internet, such as Indymedia and Common Dreams, that gather together a range of views and analysis of international developments, to suggest that people who aren't getting what they want from television will look elsewhere.
Originally posted by wEvil
Well....hatred for the current system and paranoia about current consiracy theories is arguably it's only reason for existing.
Still, it makes a change to read some more "vital" news stories than the overly processed newsmen we get on television and the radio.
However, I don't see how aiming to destroy the current system without some idea of what we would like to replace it is much of an improvement. Replacing our current system with anarchy doesn't strike me as an improvement.
Originally posted by Blitz_Lightning
Socialism-Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
Republic-A political order whose head of state is not a monarch and in modern times is usually a president.[/b]
Capitalism[/B]
Originally posted by Kellan
Apparently there are 3 more suicide bombers on the loose, according to Israeli intelligence.
And I guess moving would be interpreted as caving in to terrorists. How far do you have to move back before you get pushed into the sea?
Originally posted by Kellan
= Me. :D
Communism-A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
1/when was the Nation of Palistine invaded?
2/who started the conflict wich led to the current occupation?
3/how do the nearby nations treat the refugees?
4/were do the palistinians place there military targets (meeting places, bomb factories, ect..)?
5/were do Isralies place there military targets (helicopters, tanks, barics)
6/what do the Palistinians target?
7/what do the Isralies target?
8/wich side was willing to give the other a huge chunk of land for peace?
9/how did the other side respond?
10/wich side calls for peace and arests terrorist grupes in there teritory?
11/wich side calls for a million Shahead in Jerusilum, and funds insane killers?
12/wich side has been kicked out of every contry they've ever been in?
13/wich side has made peace with every contry bordering them that were once hell bent on destroying them? [/b]
Originally posted by Zeronet
The PA targets civilians almost exclusively, thats why they are called terrorists and they are no better than Osama Bin Laden.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Thats sick! Osama Bin Laden is a evil monster like all those suicide bombers.
I know whats going to happen, the IDF is going to crush the PA and reoccupy the Gaza Strip and the West bank. [/B]
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
Do you know that Ariel Sharon was responsible for the death of hundreds, or maybe thousands, civilians back in the 80's, when he was general in the Israeli Army? He was never prosecuted.
Originally posted by Kellan
Interesting information, Blitz_Lightning. I'm glad you brought it up. The Independent is indeed one of the better British newspapers (probably the most impartial) and I also quite like the Guardian www.guardian.co.uk
A particularly interesting piece from the Guardian today tells of how the bus from Gilo was not just packed full of Jewish Israeli commuters, but Arab-Israelis too. It appears to have been timed to derail Bush's peace proposals later this week - and it's succeeded, as Sharon has occupied the Palestinian territories now indefinitely, pre-empting Bush as the suicide bombers did.
However, I await sandwich's response to this newspaper info with less-than-glee. :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Dr.Zer0
uhh, back on topic about the bus blowing up, sandwitch, its time to move, Iv heard that now some bs is going to go on around there
Originally posted by Kellan
Apparently there are 3 more suicide bombers on the loose, according to Israeli intelligence.
And I guess moving would be interpreted as caving in to terrorists. How far do you have to move back before you get pushed into the sea?
Originally posted by Kellan
You may not be able to justify it, but you can understand it. And I still can't justify the killing of innocent civilians with a fully-equipped army any more than I can with suicide bombs.
Originally posted by Kellan
2. The conflict which led to the current Occupation was I believe one of the Arab-Israeli wars. First of all, as Israel was founded it came under attack from all sides by the other nations who didn't want it there. They were pushed back, and Israel occupied the land put aside for the creation of Palestine under the 1948 agreement. Those Palestinians who were forced out were not allowed the right of return to their farms because they had been absent during the war and Israel declared them state property. About 1/4 of farmers got a small payoff. The rest of the land was invaded in 1967 and represents something of a safety buffer zone for Israel proper. Too bad it's someone else's country, nor is it safe. :blah:
Originally posted by Kellan
6. Palestinians target military personnel and notably civilians, as they regard them all as invaders (as I understand) and don't have the weapons to fight head-to-head with the IDF.
Originally posted by Kellan
7. The Israelis target militants, or try to but end up killing a lot of civilians. It could be said that firing missiles into crowded civilian areas does not make the most sense if you're after a targeted assassination with no other casualties.
Originally posted by Kellan
8. Both sides made concessions at Camp David and Oslo. The PA was willing to drop it's unreasonable demand that Israel should not exist, and Israel was willing to give back the land it took in 1967. But only 60% of it, as stated previously. In addition, the state was crippled by not being in charge of its own electricity generation, water supplies and airspace, etc etc.
Originally posted by Kellan
9. The other side said no, understandably. After all, if they said yes that would be all they ever had, not a return to pre-1967 (and original 1948 agreement) borders. :p
Originally posted by Kellan
Sharon wants nothing but a war to utterly remove the Palestinians. The PA deplores the suicide attacks in public though there's some question about whether they do in private...
Originally posted by Kellan
12. I guess you want me to say the Jews. Again, untrue and unfair. I don't recall any purges in America, in Shanghai they were welcomed, and so on. I do realise there's a history of European persecution, though. However, what does this have to do with Israel/Palestine? The Palestinians were kicked out too. And besides, being kicked out of countries DOES NOT entitle you to kick others out in turn. It's not some kind of global kicking-wheel.
Originally posted by Kellan
13. Israel has made peace with pretty much all the other countries for a number of reasons. First, it's so much better militarily that it could probably beat all the other regional powers and take their land if it so wished. Thus the Arabs have realised that Israel is there to stay. They've accepted it's existence; why can Israel not in turn acknowledge Palestine?.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Its sad the area is in so much turmoil and the streets are dangerous, it looks like a nice area(ignoring the obvivous) to live in.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Its sad the area is in so much turmoil and the streets are dangerous, it looks like a nice area(ignoring the obvivous) to live in.
Originally posted by Kellan
Are you kidding? No offence sandwich, I'm sure there are nice places and sights, but everything I see makes it look like a desert. Lord only knows why it's the Holy Land (well, quite). :p
Oh, there was that oasis thing you showed me...that was cool.
Originally posted by ZeronetWhat, tall, phallically symbolic skyscrapers?
No , Seriously i like the place, its on the mediterranean and doesnt have all those ugly looking buildings around mine everywhere.
Originally posted by Shrike
What, tall, phallically symbolic skyscrapers?
Originally posted by Zeronet
No the general dullness of Britian, everything is grey and dull and wet. Still i imagine going on holiday in Israel wouldnt be expensive, hopefully that will be the case when i go.
Originally posted by Kellan
Are you kidding? No offence sandwich, I'm sure there are nice places and sights, but everything I see makes it look like a desert.
Originally posted by ZeronetGo to Brazil.
Im not impressed to much by grass(too much pollen). Just Irsael has lots of interesting places, better weather and its brighter and hotels are cheap.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Brazil is too hot and costs too much.
Originally posted by ZeronetCosts too much? Dude, I was there for 7 weeks and spent the equivalent of about 300-350 pounds.
Brazil is too hot and costs too much.
Originally posted by Shrike
As for the heat, well, that's due to all the hot girls. ;)
Originally posted by Maeglamor
Your home is your home no matter where it is.
What I don't really understand is, if they could just know that scuide isnt the thing todo in this situation. They should know better that they're just making the Middle East more hellish than it is now, exactly like Afghanistan.
Originally posted by Shrike
Costs too much? Dude, I was there for 7 weeks and spent the equivalent of about 300-350 pounds.
As for the heat, well, that's due to all the hot girls. ;)
Originally posted by Blitz_Lightning
It's just that, the Palestines have no way of hitting back at the Israelis apart from using terrorism. They can't fight them militarily, they can't fight them economically, they can't fight them with politics especially as Israel is the favorite of America... What can they do? They are frustrated with the occupation of their land by the Israeli soldiers. It is understandable. They have no other method of fighting back. These people suicide because they want their own back against the Israelis. You cant say the same thing for all the thousands of people in developed countries who suicide because they think life is ****.
Originally posted by Bobboau
it is going to get a lot worse before it gets better
Originally posted by sandwichI dunno, maybe because what goes around, comes around? I'm sorry, but by what I'm getting from your logic, we shouldn't have basically rebuilt Europe, shouldn't have fixed up Japan, shouldn't even have created Isreal.
Is there any reason why Israel should be the one "responsible" for the plight (yes, it truly is a plight - I'm not being sarcastic here...) of the people who left their homes because of Israel's military response to their nations' attack? I still don't see how a case can be made that Israel is responsible.
Originally posted by Shrike
I dunno, maybe because what goes around, comes around? I'm sorry, but by what I'm getting from your logic, we shouldn't have basically rebuilt Europe, shouldn't have fixed up Japan, shouldn't even have created Isreal.
Originally posted by sandwichExcept that in WWII, it went like this, more or less:
No, not that kind of responsible. I mean, to take a WWII example:
(It may not be historically accurate, but it gets the point across)
- Germany attacks France.
- France strikes back, pushing the Germans out of France and beyond, into Germany.
- Germany surrenders.
- France remains with the land they "occupied" while pushing back the Germans.
- German refugees complain that France invaded their land (huh? :wtf: ) and that they want their land back, as a seperate state, since Germany doesn't want them anymore.
- France refuses, especially considering that there are millions of French living on that land for the past 50 years.
- Interm agreement reached to allow German refugees to return to the "occupied territories", but under French rule.
- German refugees insist on their own state and start to attack France using terrorist tactics.
- France moves in to the "territories" to wipe out the terrorisim.
And so on, and so forth. [/B]
France refuses, especially considering that there are millions of French living on that land for the past 50 years.
Originally posted by Shrike
Except that in WWII, it went like this, more or less:
- Germany attacks France.
- The Allies strikes back, pushing the Germans out of France and beyond, into Germany.
- Germany surrenders.
- The Allies remains with the land they "occupied" while rebuilding the country they trashed.
- Germany, now rebuilt into an Ally-friendly nation, joins the Allies.
You should be able to see where I'm going with this. Like it or not, civilized people have an obligation to those they conquer. Sounds bizzare? Vae Victus doesn't work so well any more.... [/B]
Originally posted by Blitz_Lightning
But of course! That is why Palestinians are refusing to allow Israel to take over their land!
Err... no, that's why Israel refuses to give back the land we won in a defensive war. Get it straight.
Originally posted by Blitz_Lightning
No, that is not true...After World War II, the newly formed United Nations (which then had less developing countries as members) recommended the partition of Palestine into two states and the internationalization of Jerusalem. The minority Jewish people received the majority of the land. That is quite unfair on the Palestinians...
Originally posted by Ace
What can still be done however is reconstruction of Palestinian lands for the people. Send in peacekeepers and neutral parties, have Israeli industries but subsidiares in Palistinian lands.
Sounds too simple of a solution I'm sure, however if the common man has no reason to fight and is comfortable, the extremists and terrorists can then be rooted out gung-ho Bush cowboy style.
Originally posted by sandwichMost of those states predate the origin of Israel, so they don't count. What he was talking about was the division of the British territory of Palestine, not the whole Middle East.
And the Jewish minority in the area _did_ recieve a minority of land, or have you forgotten about Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Lybia, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc? Those are all Arab states. Israel's the only Jewish state.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
Most of those states predate the origin of Israel, so they don't count.
Originally posted by sandwichYou knew what I meant! I meant the current state of Israel, which bears little resemblance to the Biblical state.
Well now, that depends on how far back you want to go. If we were to go all the way back to Biblical times, I think that the only nation older than Israel is Egypt, which has remained pretty much as-is to this day.
Originally posted by sandwich
Well now, that depends on how far back you want to go. If we were to go all the way back to Biblical times, I think that the only nation older than Israel is Egypt, which has remained pretty much as-is to this day.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
You knew what I meant! I meant the current state of Israel, which bears little resemblance to the Biblical state.
A thought experiment I like to bring up whenever I encounter a pro-Palestinian person with the standard "Palestinians only want peace" sign:
- Assume that tomorrow, all of Europe, all of North America, the southern half of Africa, and the bulk of southeast asia disappeared.
- At the same time, assume 99% of all Israeli weapons ceased functioning.
- How many hours do you think it would be before the Arab world made sure that the Jewish people were well on their way to being extinct?
Only the most deluded of people will try and say "oh, no way....".
Originally posted by Styxx
You mean territory-wise, right? :D
Originally posted by sandwich
Well now, that depends on how far back you want to go. If we were to go all the way back to Biblical times, I think that the only nation older than Israel is Egypt, which has remained pretty much as-is to this day.
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
If you talk about middle east, there were other nations that go back as Egypt and Israel, like arabs, finicians, their decendants I believe live now in Lebanon, and others.
Now, If you are not talking about middle east but about a more general area, then there are numerous of other nations that predated you, and even some of them had colonies in middle east, like the greeks had the filistei(sp?).
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
I just heard about the attacks in the occupied territory by palestinians, what's going down there?
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
I mean both.
Originally posted by sandwich
Well, read for yourself: www.jpost.com
Originally posted by wEvil
Bleddy hell.
They just don't stop, do they?
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
You have to remember, part of the flashpoint for this current conflict was Ariel Sharon's perceived insult to the Palestinians on Temple Mount.
Originally posted by sandwich
Ok, I'm sorry, but that just pisses me off (and you all know how hard it is for me to get pissed...). Not at you, GW, but that "reason" thing... a bunch of BS.
Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount, not the freakin' Dome of the Rock!! And the Temple mount is (assuming these things can be measured and compared) far more of a holy spot to the Jews than the Dome is to the Muslims.
And yes, I see you wrote "perceived". And that's just the thing. It's bad enough that the Palestinians used that as an excuse; it just made them look like whiny children throwing temper tantrums. But for the world to "accept" that as a "legitimate" reason to get upset?!?! They should have told the PA "What the heck are you complaining about?! Stop being such cry-babies and grow up!". But noooo.... the world proved itself to be even more of an idiot for accepting that excuse.
So that's my Sabbath Rant™. *sigh* Shabbat shalom, y'all. :doubt:
Originally posted by sandwich
Shabbat shalom, y'all. :doubt:
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
I believe that means "have a nice saturday", though not sure.
Originally posted by Bobboau
your profile says Jerusalem, but you seem to be from more of a southern part of Isrial for some reason
Originally posted by sandwich
Shabbat = Sabbath (Saturday, day of rest)
Shalom = Hello, Goodbye, or in this case, Peace(ful)
Originally posted by sandwich
Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount, not the freakin' Dome of the Rock!! And the Temple mount is (assuming these things can be measured and compared) far more of a holy spot to the Jews than the Dome is to the Muslims.
And yes, I see you wrote "perceived". And that's just the thing. It's bad enough that the Palestinians used that as an excuse; it just made them look like whiny children throwing temper tantrums. But for the world to "accept" that as a "legitimate" reason to get upset?!?! They should have told the PA "What the heck are you complaining about?! Stop being such cry-babies and grow up!". But noooo.... the world proved itself to be even more of an idiot for accepting that excuse.[/B]
Originally posted by Kellan
And that everyone would sit down and start writing Dadaist poetry? :p
Originally posted by Kellan
In addition, why, may I ask with reference to the first quote do you feel the need to qualify Temple Mount as holier to Jews than Muslims? Sounds like a moral alibi to me.
In addition, the 'thought experiment' that you showed us earlier on seems flawed, in that it takes another set of unspoken assumptions on: that the Palestinians only want to destroy Israel, and that Israel would only ever defend itself. Would I be wrong to conjecture that in the absence of America holding her back, Israel would secure more territory for itself - a Greater Israel? Or that both sides would be so confused, shocked, alone that they wouldn't do anything? And that everyone would sit down and start writing Dadaist poetry? :p
As you can see, this kind of 'what if' speculation gets us nowhere fast.
The Koran actually mentions Mecca and Medina hundreds of times but the name of Jerusalem is not found. Mohammed never visited Jerusalem in the flesh. Muslims today cite the story of "Al Isra' wa Al Mi''rag," in the Koran, the seventeenth Sura, entitled "The Night Journey." According to Islamic legend, the Prophet Muhammad was carried by night in a dream "from the sacred temple to the temple that is most remote, whose precinct we have blessed, that we might show him our signs. ..." Muslims have identified the two temples mentioned in this verse as being in Mecca and Jerusalem where Muhammad then ascended to heaven from the Dome of the Rock riding on his white steed.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
OK, everyone needs to calm down. We don't need a civil war in this thread....
Originally posted by sandwichI thought it was Abraham.
The Temple Mount is where the First and Second Temples were built. It is also known as Mt. Moriah, where Moses brought his son, Issac, before God to be sacrificed.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
I thought it was Abraham.
An interesting little bit of trivia is that the Jews believe themselves to be descended from Isaac, while Muslims claim to be descended from Abraham's other son (I can't remember the name). Correct me if I'm wrong, OC.
Originally posted by icespeed
what i dont really get is, isn't allah and jehovah the same god? basically?
Originally posted by Bobboau
doesn't Islam calim Abraham as it's founder
Originally posted by sandwich
No!! :eek: I know this will either spark a flame or a intense "discussion", but I'll say it anyway: In my opinion, and according to the Christian faith, there is no other God but the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. Allah, to put it bluntly, is either of the devil, or is Satan himself.
But if you look at the major (semitic, I guess) religions they have an awful lot of similarities. Can they not just call it quits and get along in one big, happy family? :p
Originally posted by CP5670
Trying to make sense out of nonsense is a fairly fruitless task. :p :D
For too long, the citizens of the Middle East have lived in the midst of death and fear. The hatred of a few holds the hopes of many hostage. The forces of extremism and terror are attempting to kill progress and peace by killing the innocent. And this casts a dark shadow over an entire region. For the sake of all humanity, things must change in the Middle East.
It is untenable for Israeli citizens to live in terror. It is untenable for Palestinians to live in squalor and occupation. And the current situation offers no prospect that life will improve. Israeli citizens will continue to be victimized by terrorists, and so Israel will continue to defend herself.
In the situation the Palestinian people will grow more and more miserable. My vision is two states, living side by side in peace and security. There is simply no way to achieve that peace until all parties fight terror. Yet, at this critical moment, if all parties will break with the past and set out on a new path, we can overcome the darkness with the light of hope. Peace requires a new and different Palestinian leadership, so that a Palestinian state can be born.
I call on the Palestinian people to elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror. I call upon them to build a practicing democracy, based on tolerance and liberty. If the Palestinian people actively pursue these goals, America and the world will actively support their efforts. If the Palestinian people meet these goals, they will be able to reach agreement with Israel and Egypt and Jordan on security and other arrangements for independence
And when the Palestinian people have new leaders, new institutions and new security arrangements with their neighbors, the United States of America will support the creation of a Palestinian state whose borders and certain aspects of its sovereignty will be provisional until resolved as part of a final settlement in the Middle East.
In the work ahead, we all have responsibilities. The Palestinian people are gifted and capable, and I am confident they can achieve a new birth for their nation. A Palestinian state will never be created by terror -- it will be built through reform. And reform must be more than cosmetic change, or veiled attempt to preserve the status quo. True reform will require entirely new political and economic institutions, based on democracy, market economics and action against terrorism.
Today, the elected Palestinian legislature has no authority, and power is concentrated in the hands of an unaccountable few. A Palestinian state can only serve its citizens with a new constitution which separates the powers of government. The Palestinian parliament should have the full authority of a legislative body. Local officials and government ministers need authority of their own and the independence to govern effectively.
The United States, along with the European Union and Arab states, will work with Palestinian leaders to create a new constitutional framework, and a working democracy for the Palestinian people. And the United States, along with others in the international community will help the Palestinians organize and monitor fair, multi-party local elections by the end of the year, with national elections to follow.
Today, the Palestinian people live in economic stagnation, made worse by official corruption. A Palestinian state will require a vibrant economy, where honest enterprise is encouraged by honest government. The United States, the international donor community and the World Bank stand ready to work with Palestinians on a major project of economic reform and development. The United States, the EU, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund are willing to oversee reforms in Palestinian finances, encouraging transparency and independent auditing.
And the United States, along with our partners in the developed world, will increase our humanitarian assistance to relieve Palestinian suffering. Today, the Palestinian people lack effective courts of law and have no means to defend and vindicate their rights. A Palestinian state will require a system of reliable justice to punish those who prey on the innocent. The United States and members of the international community stand ready to work with Palestinian leaders to establish finance -- establish finance and monitor a truly independent judiciary.
Today, Palestinian authorities are encouraging, not opposing, terrorism. This is unacceptable. And the United States will not support the establishment of a Palestinian state until its leaders engage in a sustained fight against the terrorists and dismantle their infrastructure. This will require an externally supervised effort to rebuild and reform the Palestinian security services. The security system must have clear lines of authority and accountability and a unified chain of command.
America is pursuing this reform along with key regional states. The world is prepared to help, yet ultimately these steps toward statehood depend on the Palestinian people and their leaders. If they energetically take the path of reform, the rewards can come quickly. If Palestinians embrace democracy, confront corruption and firmly reject terror, they can count on American support for the creation of a provisional state of Palestine.
With a dedicated effort, this state could rise rapidly, as it comes to terms with Israel, Egypt and Jordan on practical issues, such as security. The final borders, the capital and other aspects of this state's sovereignty will be negotiated between the parties, as part of a final settlement. Arab states have offered their help in this process, and their help is needed.
I've said in the past that nations are either with us or against us in the war on terror. To be counted on the side of peace, nations must act. Every leader actually committed to peace will end incitement to violence in official media, and publicly denounce homicide bombings. Every nation actually committed to peace will stop the flow of money, equipment and recruits to terrorist groups seeking the destruction of Israel -- including Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah. Every nation actually committed to peace must block the shipment of Iranian supplies to these groups, and oppose regimes that promote terror, like Iraq. And Syria must choose the right side in the war on terror by closing terrorist camps and expelling terrorist organizations.
Leaders who want to be included in the peace process must show by their deeds an undivided support for peace. And as we move toward a peaceful solution, Arab states will be expected to build closer ties of diplomacy and commerce with Israel, leading to full normalization of relations between Israel and the entire Arab world.
Israel also has a large stake in the success of a democratic Palestine. Permanent occupation threatens Israel's identity and democracy. A stable, peaceful Palestinian state is necessary to achieve the security that Israel longs for. So I challenge Israel to take concrete steps to support the emergence of a viable, credible Palestinian state.
As we make progress towards security, Israel forces need to withdraw fully to positions they held prior to September 28, 2000. And consistent with the recommendations of the Mitchell Committee, Israeli settlement activity in the occupied territories must stop.
The Palestinian economy must be allowed to develop. As violence subsides, freedom of movement should be restored, permitting innocent Palestinians to resume work and normal life. Palestinian legislators and officials, humanitarian and international workers, must be allowed to go about the business of building a better future. And Israel should release frozen Palestinian revenues into honest, accountable hands.
I've asked Secretary Powell to work intensively with Middle Eastern and international leaders to realize the vision of a Palestinian state, focusing them on a comprehensive plan to support Palestinian reform and institution-building.
Ultimately, Israelis and Palestinians must address the core issues that divide them if there is to be a real peace, resolving all claims and ending the conflict between them. This means that the Israeli occupation that began in 1967 will be ended through a settlement negotiated between the parties, based on U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338, with Israeli withdrawal to secure and recognize borders.
We must also resolve questions concerning Jerusalem, the plight and future of Palestinian refugees, and a final peace between Israel and Lebanon, and Israel and a Syria that supports peace and fights terror.
All who are familiar with the history of the Middle East realize that there may be setbacks in this process. Trained and determined killers, as we have seen, want to stop it. Yet the Egyptian and Jordanian peace treaties with Israel remind us that with determined and responsible leadership progress can come quickly.
As new Palestinian institutions and new leaders emerge, demonstrating real performance on security and reform, I expect Israel to respond and work toward a final status agreement. With intensive effort by all, this agreement could be reached within three years from now. And I and my country will actively lead toward that goal.
I can understand the deep anger and anguish of the Israeli people. You've lived too long with fear and funerals, having to avoid markets and public transportation, and forced to put armed guards in kindergarten classrooms. The Palestinian Authority has rejected your offer at hand, and trafficked with terrorists. You have a right to a normal life; you have a right to security; and I deeply believe that you need a reformed, responsible Palestinian partner to achieve that security.
I can understand the deep anger and despair of the Palestinian people. For decades you've been treated as pawns in the Middle East conflict. Your interests have been held hostage to a comprehensive peace agreement that never seems to come, as your lives get worse year by year. You deserve democracy and the rule of law. You deserve an open society and a thriving economy. You deserve a life of hope for your children. An end to occupation and a peaceful democratic Palestinian state may seem distant, but America and our partners throughout the world stand ready to help, help you make them possible as soon as possible.
If liberty can blossom in the rocky soil of the West Bank and Gaza, it will inspire millions of men and women around the globe who are equally weary of poverty and oppression, equally entitled to the benefits of democratic government.
I have a hope for the people of Muslim countries. Your commitments to morality, and learning, and tolerance led to great historical achievements. And those values are alive in the Islamic world today. You have a rich culture, and you share the aspirations of men and women in every culture. Prosperity and freedom and dignity are not just American hopes, or Western hopes. They are universal, human hopes. And even in the violence and turmoil of the Middle East, America believes those hopes have the power to transform lives and nations.
This moment is both an opportunity and a test for all parties in the Middle East: an opportunity to lay the foundations for future peace; a test to show who is serious about peace and who is not. The choice here is stark and simple. The Bible says, "I have set before you life and death; therefore, choose life." The time has arrived for everyone in this conflict to choose peace, and hope, and life.
Thank you very much.
Originally posted by icespeedYes, Sandwich is spewing crap. Traditionally, Jews and Christians were honored in Muslim society as being partially enlightened, but the radical interpretations used by the terrorist organizations disregard this.
i dont really get is, isn't allah and jehovah the same god, basically?
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
Traditionally, Jews and Christians were honored in Muslim society as being partially enlightened, but the radical interpretations used by the terrorist organizations disregard this.
Originally posted by Shrike
As a non-practicing atheist, I find this rather amusing. :D
Originally posted by sandwichI'm a natural. I don't need practice. :D
Uhm.... What the heck is a non-practicing atheist???
Originally posted by Shrike
I'm a natural. I don't need practice. :D
Originally posted by Shrike
Well, the definition of an atheist is basically one who defines their sprituality by defying the existence of a/the diety(ies). But I see no real need to do that, so I'm non-practicing.
Originally posted by Shrike
What's there to explain?
I don't feel the need to express my spirituality by the denial of 'higher powers.' :D
Originally posted by Carl
ALL YOUR RELIGON ARE BELONG TO US!!!!
Originally posted by Carl
Allah is the muslim name for Jehovah. you could say that they are the same.
...but you'd be wrong :p
Originally posted by sandwich
Anyways, because of all that there can be "innocent" mix-ups, but make no mistake: the Allah that the Muslims worship is most definetly not YHWH.
Originally posted by Styxx
Oh, NO! This is turning into another religion thread!! :eek:
Okay, if CP starts his speeches again I'm gonna kill someone, and it won't be painless!! :D
Nah, not really. :p
Originally posted by wEvil
Popcorn....check.
Cuppa tea...check.
Cranium....check.
*settles back to enjoy the show*
:headz:
Originally posted by Styxx
You forgot to check the poking sktick... :D
Originally posted by wEvil
I have a standard-issue HLP shotgun in the holster to my left ;)
Okay, if CP starts his speeches again I'm gonna kill someone, and it won't be painless!! :D
Originally posted by wEvil
I have a standard-issue HLP shotgun in the holster to my left ;)
Y'know, Sitting Bull was a militant, too.
[rest of post]
Ok now going OT for a little bit.
[rest of post]
A Democracy is where the people vote on everything. Democracy is mob-rule and mob-rule, it doesn't matter if your religious or not, let a murder go just so they could see an innocent man be crucified. You know who that he was, or for some including myself still is? Chirst. Even I think CP would agree that it is not logical to let somebody go that might kill someone else, since he's done it before, just so some people can see a man that's done nothing wrong be.
that stuff about the gods is bizzarre, didnt know about all that, and hope none of u guys subscribe to it either. lets just say, the gods would not be pleased if they knew.
Originally posted by CP5670
I might have agreed with that but I am not sure what you are trying to say
I'm trying to say that doing things just because the people want it is normally based upon irrational descisions based upon the times.
But anyway, always use common-sense when considering this sort of subject. Are they all blood-thirsty terrorists? Or are they most likely normal people?
On another note, "Jihad" does not mean just "Holy War". AFAIK, it mean service to Islam in many different forms.
Originally posted by Kellan[/b]
4. It messes with people's free wills in very obvious ways. Now, since it would be building on previous conditioning I don't suppose that counts as a factor. The fact remains though that it would be propaganda, not truth - hardly a step towards a brighter future. It's altogther too Nazi for my tastes.
Feel free to dispute...I shall be back once I have packed for my holiday. :p
An interesting little bit of trivia is that the Jews believe themselves to be descended from Isaac, while Muslims claim to be descended from Abraham's other son (I can't remember the name). Correct me if I'm wrong, OC.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
Sandwich, to truly assess this, you must view this from a 3rd-person perspective, prefferably one which doesn't favor destroying everything :D
But anyway, the fact that the Palestinian militants want to destroy Israel is not a true cross-section of the Palestinian people. I bet that if we took your standard, mild-mannered, peace-loving Palestinian and your standard, mild-mannered, peace-loving Israeli, they'd probably get along pretty well. If you didn't talk about religion, they probably would be very similar, other than the fact that the Muslim would be sober all the time due to the ban on alchohol. Most people's opinions are based on what they hear in the media, whether independent, corporate, or state-run. You have to remember that all these sources are BIASED. BIAS is BAD. You get misconceptions, which are formed into beliefs. If you were to base your opinions on what the media reports, you'd probably think that all Americans are pot-smoking, acid-taking, drunken bastards who complain all the time and get into accidents (BTW, most of that is wrong expcept for the fact that quite a few people do complain that much.)
But anyway, always use common-sense when considering this sort of subject. Are they all blood-thirsty terrorists? Or are they most likely normal people?
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
On another note, "Jihad" does not mean just "Holy War". AFAIK, it mean service to Islam in many different forms.
From The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company (http://www.eref-trade.hmco.com/). Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
[color=444490]ji·had[/color][/size] also [color=444490]je·had[/color] (jĭ-häd' (http://www.atomica.com/lookup2/pronkey.html))(http://www.atomica.com/content2/img/pron.gif) (http://www.atomica.com/content2/ahd4/pron/J0027800.wav).
n.
[list=1]
- A Muslim holy war or spiritual struggle against infidels.
- A crusade or struggle: “The war against smoking is turning into a jihad against people who smoke” (Fortune).
[/list=1]
[Arabic jihâd, from jahada, to strive.]
Originally posted by Blitz_Lightning
Yes, although Jihad means "holy war", Jihad can only end when Islam takes over the whole world. According to Islam, the world is split up into two: Al-dar-Harb (land of the lawless) and Al-dar-Islam (land of the lawful). These two lands are in constant conflict until either Islam takes over the world or is wiped out. This war doesn't end until the whole world submits to Islam.