Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Sandwich on July 19, 2002, 09:31:16 am
-
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,381666,00.asp
:rolleyes: :mad:
-
Originally posted by sandwich
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,381666,00.asp
:rolleyes: :mad:
Pfft, and we buy that kind of stuff. :p
-
bah... BAH I tell you! :mad:
-
Kinda a confusing article, too... WHICH is faster???
-
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Kinda a confusing article, too... WHICH is faster???
v2.0 without the red
-
Originally posted by vadar_1
v2.0 without the red
Noo.... the logo with the red, USB 2.0 High Speed, is what has been known until now as USB 2.0. The older USB 1.1 will henceforth be known as USB 2.0 Full Speed.
I think. :p
-
Originally posted by sandwich
I think. :p
You think right young padawan :p
-
the one WITHOUT red = fast
-
Kazan, are you reading it right?
...products that were called USB 1.1 are now USB 2.0 Full Speed, according to the Implementers Forum. Products that run at USB 2.0's 480 Mbps, on the other hand, are called USB 2.0 High Speed. Full speed products use a slightly different logo that lacks a red bar with the words "high speed" in 2-point type.
It says right there that the old 1.1 will be called USB 2.0 Full Speed, and that the original USB 2.0 (which ran at 480mbps) will be called USB 2.0 High Speed, and will be marked with that logo with the red bar.
The newly-named 2.0 won't have it.
Bah. Leave it to the corporate heads to try and complicate the computer world even further.
-
I still am not entirely sure I get it... ah well. This is why you not only assemble your own computer, but make your own components, too. Forget electricity, water-powered graphics cards are the 20-ton wave of the future!
-
Dang - I should respond to that article with a link to this thread, show 'em what kind of confusion they're creating.
-
I have seen this type of thing happen a few times in the last several years; typical corporate nonsense. :p
-
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Kinda a confusing article, too... WHICH is faster???
The most expensive one.
-
Originally posted by aldo_14
The most expensive one.
Sure, that's what they want you to believe. :p
I still get a 404 when I try to open that page though. Bah, I say. Bah, to the heavens!!! Oh, shudder! ;)
-
Originally posted by Kellan
Sure, that's what they want you to believe. :p
I still get a 404 when I try to open that page though. Bah, I say. Bah, to the heavens!!! Oh, shudder! ;)
:wtf:!!!??!?!
Dang, you're waxing poetic tonight. :D
-
Originally posted by sandwich
Dang, you're waxing poetic tonight. :D
No, Mr. Sandwich my good fellow, I am an actor. :D
Okay, I think I'll end this pointlessly camp charade now. :nod:
-
Originally posted by Kellan
No, Mr. Sandwich my good fellow, I am an actor. :D
Okay, I think I'll end this pointlessly camp charade now. :nod:
Actor?? What's with the italics on "or"?? :wtf: :p
-
Originally posted by sandwich
Actor?? What's with the italics on "or"?? :wtf: :p
It's a pronunciation thing - very hard to get across in writing. Basically though, normal people call actors "actors" without any stress on anything. Pretentiously arty actors, though, call themselves "act-ors"... :p
Does that make ANY sense? :)
-
Originally posted by Kellan
It's a pronunciation thing - very hard to get across in writing. Basically though, normal people call actors "actors" without any stress on anything. Pretentiously arty actors, though, call themselves "act-ors"... :p
Does that make ANY sense? :)
Actually, yes it does, and since I am around people from all over the world here, it's even understandable.... to a degree. :D
color, Color, COLOR!
*ahem* You didn't see any missing "u"'s there, no-sir-ee! :p
Oh crap - I spent too much time looking at the word "color", and now it doesn't look right at all - more like a nonsense word. :doubt: :p
-
I spent too much time looking at the word "color", and now it doesn't look right at all - more like a nonsense word.
You know, that happens to me as well if I try to examine any one word closely. :p
-
Originally posted by CP5670
You know, that happens to me as well if I try to examine any one word closely. :p
:nod:
-
Originally posted by sandwich
Actually, yes it does, and since I am around people from all over the world here, it's even understandable.... to a degree. :D
color, Color, COLOR!
*ahem* You didn't see any missing "u"'s there, no-sir-ee! :p
Oh crap - I spent too much time looking at the word "color", and now it doesn't look right at all - more like a nonsense word. :doubt: :p
Thats because when you say Colour, you do pronounce the u to a degree, otherwise you'd be saying something like collor which sounds like a dog wears. The u in color was removed by Americans because it was deemed too complicated.
-
Originally posted by Zeronet
Thats because when you say Colour, you do pronounce the u to a degree, otherwise you'd be saying something like collor, which is something a dog wears. The u in color was removed by Americans because they needed simplier words and colour was deemed complicated as was the word centre.
Heh, before you rip on Americans for spelling, make sure you can spell yourself. :p
-
Originally posted by Dynamo
Heh, before you rip on Americans for spelling, make sure you can spell yourself. :p
:wtf: :wtf: Sorry for not being a Perfect typer, or proof reading my posts to make sure my grammer is correct and i meant what i said, because when i said collor, i was merely adding a L, and relating the pronunciation of color to sounds like something a dog wears.
The above paragraph is copyright 2002 by Zeronet and should not be quoted without permission
-
Americans don't pronounce color like a dog collar. We pronounce it "culler". (hard to get across in writing without sounding like a redneck...) :D
-
I personally don't have any problem with Americans changing the spellings of English words because their spellings make more sense. I mean, in the word specialise we use an S, but it actually sounds like a Z - SO WHY THE HELL DON'T WE USE ONE??? :wtf:
And don't even get me started on manouvre. :p
-
You mean maneuver, right? :D:p
-
Originally posted by Mad Bomber
You mean maneuver, right? :D:p
Actually, I almost always spell it like that because it's the easiest to remember. Language should be easy to learn and use, or else you're shutting people out. That = BAD!! :nod:
-
Originally posted by Kellan
I personally don't have any problem with Americans changing the spellings of English words because their spellings make more sense. I mean, in the word specialise we use an S, but it actually sounds like a Z - SO WHY THE HELL DON'T WE USE ONE??? :wtf:
That almost gets you a hug, good Brit, very good
*gives Kellan cookie*
-
Originally posted by Blue Lion
That almost gets you a hug, good Brit, very good
*gives Kellan cookie*
*munch* *crunch*
I also came to America this year on holiday, boosting your economy out of potential recession by spending my money in Florida on new clothes and shoes and access to exorbitantly expensive theme parks. Does that count too? :)
-
Yes, how was it?
-
Excellent. It rained a lot, which I had been told to expect by sandwich, but that didn't really stop us doing stuff (even went to Typhoon Lagoon during a thunderstorm, so hardly anyone was there). There was also lots of stuff to buy, and some music I can't get here.
For the second week we went South to Marco Island. Mmm, heated pool. It was very relaxing, and we also hired a boat (mmm, sunburn :o) and went to the Everglades (mmm, Mosquito repellent :doubt: )
So yeah, I liked it.
-
Originally posted by Kellan
I personally don't have any problem with Americans changing the spellings of English words because their spellings make more sense. I mean, in the word specialise we use an S, but it actually sounds like a Z - SO WHY THE HELL DON'T WE USE ONE??? :wtf:
And don't even get me started on manouvre. :p
the British empire was founded on the English language*. It took so long for other countries to figure out what the declarations of war / colonisation meant, that we'd already moved in and established team emporiams and whatnot. Tally ho.
* oh - and on cups of tea.
-
Originally posted by Zeronet
:wtf: :wtf: Sorry for not being a Perfect typer, or proof reading my posts to make sure my grammer is correct and i meant what i said, because when i said collor, i was merely adding a L, and relating the pronunciation of color to sounds like something a dog wears.
The above paragraph is copyright 2002 by Zeronet and should not be quoted without permission
:D
Originally posted by Kellan
It was very relaxing, and we also hired a boat (mmm, sunburn :o) and went to the Everglades (mmm, Mosquito repellent :doubt: )
So yeah, I liked it.
*sigh* Ahh, Florida - Land of the Old, and Home only to the Brave! :p
Originally posted by aldo_14
the British empire was founded on the English language*. It took so long for other countries to figure out what the declarations of war / colonisation meant, that we'd already moved in and established team emporiams and whatnot. Tally ho.
* oh - and on cups of tea.
You guys are lucky we haven't changed "empire" to "empier".
.
..
...
....
Nahh, maybe not - that just looks plain stoopid. :D
"The crackers, Grommet! We forgot the crackers!"