Hard Light Productions Forums
General FreeSpace => FreeSpace Discussion => Topic started by: Liberator on March 18, 2002, 06:56:28 pm
-
Based on one of the posts below, I had an Idea for a thread about design characteristics for Space craft, not some flying brick that has to reenter a planets atmosphere.
1. Any shape is good, but simpler is better.
2. Projections(wings and such) are okay as they allow any nav thrusters a better postion to apply force to move the craft.
3. Basic Geometric shapes make for boring ship design
-
|>|-|34/2 my tetrahedron!! :D:D
Some FS ships look like they might be atmosphere-capable, but the only ones that we can be certain of are the transports (picking up/deploying ground troops) and gas miners (specifically stated). None of those really have very aerodynamic shapes though, so I don't really know...
-
The seth is ablr to fly in atmosphere, you see one escaping from a Vasudan city destroyed by the Lucifer, in FS1.
-
And the gas miners probably operate on the high atmosphere of low-gravity gas giants, they don't really look like they could stand that much of a gravity pull...
-
Originally posted by Styxx
And the gas miners probably operate on the high atmosphere of low-gravity gas giants, they don't really look like they could stand that much of a gravity pull...
They are about as streamlined as brick, basically.
I'm amazed they can stand any gravity.
-
Forget streamlined, they're as solid as a Microsoft OS. The little pointy bits? The tiny rotation points?
-
|>|-|34/2 my tetrahedron!!
ROTFLMAO. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
-
:mad: leetspeak...
-
Originally posted by GalacticEmperor
:mad: leetspeak...
very inaccurate l337 speak
-
That is not 1337 sp34k; it is 5|_||>4/21347 5|>33|< !! (suparleat speek / super-elite speak) Far superior to standard 1337 sp34k ! ;7;7:D
-
The only *really* atmospheric capable ship that is aerodynamic is the Perseus. That is the only really one I can think of....
-
Keep in mind dual-medium craft are notoriously bad in term of their performance in one or both mediums they were designed for.
The Perseus 'wings' apply to #2 & 3 above. They serve to lower propellant costs in an effort to increase range. Plus they just look cool. But atmospheric, I don't think so. It'd be nice to hear from :V: on this. But as best as I can tell the 'wings' have no airfoil in their shape.