Hard Light Productions Forums

General FreeSpace => FreeSpace Discussion => Topic started by: Thisisaverylongusername on November 17, 2014, 09:25:57 pm

Title: Iceni question
Post by: Thisisaverylongusername on November 17, 2014, 09:25:57 pm
So instead of going through the bother of sabotaging the Colossus, why couldn't the Iceni have jumped out behind the Knossos, where the Colossus couldn't get into range with its main guns? How did they even get saboteurs aboard the Colossus?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on November 17, 2014, 10:44:58 pm
Beware "why didn't they just...?" questions as regards to subspace jumps; that way lies madness.

As for your second question, how do you know there were NTF saboteurs on the Colossus?
Spoiler:
How do you know Command didn't just want the Iceni to make it to the nebula so they could what happened with the ETAK project, and just pretended that the Colossus was the victim of NTF sabotage?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Thisisaverylongusername on November 18, 2014, 03:49:26 pm
Excellent answers with even more questions raised... thread closed for another 300 years until we can get the answers!  :p
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on November 19, 2014, 04:53:10 am
The conspiracy theory is filled with good evidence. Right at the Chariots mission (2nd), Bosch tries to negotiate with Command. Command guy doesn't give Bosch a chance to deal with the GTVA, but let's remember that Command Guy is just a ranking officer guy sitting at a desk inside your battleship. Right afterwards, you are told to pursue Bosch but you were clearly given bad coordinates and there's no blockade near the node. From that moment on, the NTF goes on a blitzkrieg towards the Nebula, and all of their fleet is squashed by command except for the flagship with the ETAK device. It really looks as if Bosch contacted GTVA high command, told them what he really thought about the Shivans, told them what he was really trying to do, and managed a deal wherein he would sacrifice the entire NTF fleet and in return he would be able to flee to the Nebula to contact the Shivans.

It's also really possible that this deal was behind closed doors and unbeknownst to even big chaps like Petrarch. It is possible that the people who negotiated with Bosch did all the things so that it would appear as if the GTVA was really trying hard to catch Bosch, while giving him enough edges to do his own thing.

Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: qwadtep on November 22, 2014, 02:28:54 am
There's no grand conspiracy between Bosch and the GTVA. Command just knows that whatever Bosch is up to is probably extremely valuable and bides its time until the project is complete so it can be captured. The rank-and-file pilots and crews who are tasked with fighting the real military threat (the NTF fleet) simply aren't privy to the plan.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: An4ximandros on November 22, 2014, 07:41:32 am
They could what happened, Ralwood... but did they? :P

The most likely scenario here is simple: SOC already knew what Bosch was trying to do. And they wanted a piece of that pie. I would not even reject the idea that the player gets thrown into the NTF as a defector because whatever spy is close to Bosch is probably drawing some attention; and you are just bait to lure them away long enough to let them finish their mission.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: DeepSpace9er on November 24, 2014, 10:07:43 pm
Command let Bosch go in 2 and 3. They wanted to find out what he was up to and it ended the battle for Deneb. As for the other escapes by Bosch, they were well executed get-aways. Command was out to capture or kill him by Endgame.

The real question is, why did the Iceni jump in a perfect position to jump out 30 seconds later? Yet the gas miners, Sunder, Iceni (Rebels and Renegades), Bastion, and the capella evac convoys all require lengthy 10-15 minute slow boating from the jump in point to the node? How can the Iceni in one mission just make a suicide run for the Knossos, yet every other ship requires a nice long 15 minute escort with waves of fighters and bombers coming after them? Dont you think especially the capella evacuations would be rapid? And yeah the Psamtik had interference from the subspace portal, but why didnt the Iceni in Endgame?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Droid803 on November 24, 2014, 11:47:00 pm
Perhaps the Iceni simply has a better jump drive/nav system than the Psamtik.
It is one-of-a-kind ship, presumably modified for the exact purpose of making that run.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on November 25, 2014, 05:32:45 am
There's no grand conspiracy between Bosch and the GTVA. Command just knows that whatever Bosch is up to is probably extremely valuable and bides its time until the project is complete so it can be captured. The rank-and-file pilots and crews who are tasked with fighting the real military threat (the NTF fleet) simply aren't privy to the plan.

You realise your idea is compatible with a conspiracy, right? Bosch has an "understanding" with the GTVA. It's a very limited one, but it clearly exists. That never meant that they were now best friends forever.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Megawolf492 on November 26, 2014, 09:01:00 pm
As for your second question, how do you know there were NTF saboteurs on the Colossus?
Spoiler:
How do you know Command didn't just want the Iceni to make it to the nebula so they could what happened with the ETAK project, and just pretended that the Colossus was the victim of NTF sabotage?

Who said it had to be NTF sabotage? It could have been GTVA/SOC people that they just swept under the rug (or let hang out to dry).

You realise your idea is compatible with a conspiracy, right? Bosch has an "understanding" with the GTVA. It's a very limited one, but it clearly exists. That never meant that they were now best friends forever.

If you mean that he understood what command was doing, yeah I'd agree to that. If what you mean is he called them up and said "Let's make a deal", then no. Command was smart enough to understand what he was doing without Bosch's input. Even though he wasn't as fanatical as his followers, he still hated the GTVA. He wouldn't negotiate unless he was flustered and not in (relative) control. We see that in the second mission and no where else.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on November 26, 2014, 10:44:59 pm
As for your second question, how do you know there were NTF saboteurs on the Colossus?
Spoiler:
How do you know Command didn't just want the Iceni to make it to the nebula so they could what happened with the ETAK project, and just pretended that the Colossus was the victim of NTF sabotage?

Who said it had to be NTF sabotage? It could have been GTVA/SOC people that they just swept under the rug (or let hang out to dry).
Well, it was in direct response to this question:
So instead of going through the bother of sabotaging the Colossus, why couldn't the Iceni have jumped out behind the Knossos, where the Colossus couldn't get into range with its main guns? How did they even get saboteurs aboard the Colossus?
So... that's who said it was NTF sabotage. :P

You realise your idea is compatible with a conspiracy, right? Bosch has an "understanding" with the GTVA. It's a very limited one, but it clearly exists. That never meant that they were now best friends forever.

If you mean that he understood what command was doing, yeah I'd agree to that. If what you mean is he called them up and said "Let's make a deal", then no. Command was smart enough to understand what he was doing without Bosch's input. Even though he wasn't as fanatical as his followers, he still hated the GTVA. He wouldn't negotiate unless he was flustered and not in (relative) control. We see that in the second mission and no where else.
How do you know Bosch hates the GTVA?

(Edited to correct a bizarre quote misattribution.)
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on November 27, 2014, 04:32:19 am
If you mean that he understood what command was doing, yeah I'd agree to that. If what you mean is he called them up and said "Let's make a deal", then no. Command was smart enough to understand what he was doing without Bosch's input. Even though he wasn't as fanatical as his followers, he still hated the GTVA. He wouldn't negotiate unless he was flustered and not in (relative) control. We see that in the second mission and no where else.

This is flat out wrong headed. Freespace 2 is incredibly minimalistic in its writing, meaning that a few words here and there will describe whole events, instead of dragging lore writing on and on and on like other games do. The simple fact that right in the second mission we see Bosch attempting to negotiate with Command a safe passage, and that in the third mission we are both shown GTVA's "incompetency" at capturing Bosch, and told by one strident wingmate how this is obvious Command's decision, it becomes obvious that not only these people are able to negotiate things, they clearly did so right at the start.

You say "well that's just because he was flustered", but it's also obvious he was getting in a harsher situation by the end of his campaign.

You say he "hated" the GTVA, when the evidence for this is ambiguous at best. The GTVA is basically an alliance between a powerful thriving Vasudan species and a crisis-laden problematic human species. It's obvious that in FS2 timeline, Khonsu II is the most powerful political figure in the Alliance. To be against the GTVA was to be against Vasudans. But Bosch was not particularly fighting against Vasudan species: "What my enemies will never understand is that my rebellion is about my love for humanity, not my hatred of Vasudans." He was fighting to get the human species in a whole different direction: to arrange an alliance with the Shivans. He used basic ethnic paranoia and tribalism as a tool to pursue his goals, he was most likely not characterized by them.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Megawolf492 on November 27, 2014, 09:25:38 pm
As for your second question, how do you know there were NTF saboteurs on the Colossus?
Spoiler:
How do you know Command didn't just want the Iceni to make it to the nebula so they could what happened with the ETAK project, and just pretended that the Colossus was the victim of NTF sabotage?

Who said it had to be NTF sabotage? It could have been GTVA/SOC people that they just swept under the rug (or let hang out to dry).
Well, it was in direct response to this question:
So instead of going through the bother of sabotaging the Colossus, why couldn't the Iceni have jumped out behind the Knossos, where the Colossus couldn't get into range with its main guns?
So... you said it was NTF sabotage. :P

Uh, that wasn't me that said that. That was the original poster, "Thisisaverylongusername".

How do you know Bosch hates the GTVA?

He says this in one of his monologues:
Quote
What my enemies will never understand is that my rebellion is about my love for humanity and not my hatred of Vasudans.

So even though the rebellion was a smoke screen, he did believe in its core ideals. He hated the GTVA, even if it was only because of the V part.

Freespace 2 is incredibly minimalistic in its writing, meaning that a few words here and there will describe whole events, instead of dragging lore writing on and on and on like other games do. The simple fact that right in the second mission we see Bosch attempting to negotiate with Command a safe passage, and that in the third mission we are both shown GTVA's "incompetency" at capturing Bosch, and told by one strident wingmate how this is obvious Command's decision, it becomes obvious that not only these people are able to negotiate things, they clearly did so right at the start.

I agree that FS2 has less lore than, say, Mass Effect. However, to stretch what lore we do have over the gaps is unwise in my opinion. Yes, Bosch tried to negotiate in mission 2. Does that mean that he negotiated before? Not necessarily. If he did negotiate before mission 2, why would he negotiate again? It's clear that the fighters/bombers that attacked him posed no problem. He was concerned about the warships that were in the blockade and elsewhere in Deneb. If he and the GTVA had an agreement, he shouldn't be worried. His safety would be ensured if he had a prior agreement. Besides, why would he say "I would question the wisdom of your leaders" if the leaders helped him out?

You say "well that's just because he was flustered", but it's also obvious he was getting in a harsher situation by the end of his campaign.

To his rebellion, yes, but not his ultimate goal. By the end of the rebellion, the ETAK device was (almost?) complete, so all he had to do was get to the nebula. It's probable that the Iceni had a better than average engine & subspace drive, so it could out run/jump most ships. The saboteurs on the Colossus were an ace in the hole if he needed it. So even though reaching the nebula was risky, he had it relatively under control.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on November 28, 2014, 04:16:03 am
I agree that FS2 has less lore than, say, Mass Effect. However, to stretch what lore we do have over the gaps is unwise in my opinion. Yes, Bosch tried to negotiate in mission 2. Does that mean that he negotiated before? Not necessarily. If he did negotiate before mission 2, why would he negotiate again? It's clear that the fighters/bombers that attacked him posed no problem. He was concerned about the warships that were in the blockade and elsewhere in Deneb. If he and the GTVA had an agreement, he shouldn't be worried. His safety would be ensured if he had a prior agreement. Besides, why would he say "I would question the wisdom of your leaders" if the leaders helped him out?

You are confused. We are discussing what happened in the Collossus sabotaging, not what happened before the events of FS2. I never said, nor anyone else did, that Bosch had a previous dealing with Command. That is something that we can agree probably never happened. The events in the second mission hint that this was his first attempt to negotiate with Command. It's not necessarily "true", but we can assume it is for the sake of what we know. What I and others have been defending is that from mission 2 henceforth, Bosch could have been in intermittent contact with Command, and perhaps negotiating terms and conditions that ended up with Bosch sacrificing his entire fleet so that he alone could enter the nebula. Everyone got what they wanted. Bosch entered the nebula with the ETAK technology, the GTVA got the entire NTF fleet destroyed.

Quote
To his rebellion, yes, but not his ultimate goal. By the end of the rebellion, the ETAK device was (almost?) complete, so all he had to do was get to the nebula. It's probable that the Iceni had a better than average engine & subspace drive, so it could out run/jump most ships. The saboteurs on the Colossus were an ace in the hole if he needed it. So even though reaching the nebula was risky, he had it relatively under control.

Sure, this is extremely possible. The saboteurs could have been NTF agents.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on November 28, 2014, 01:27:45 pm
As for your second question, how do you know there were NTF saboteurs on the Colossus?
Spoiler:
How do you know Command didn't just want the Iceni to make it to the nebula so they could what happened with the ETAK project, and just pretended that the Colossus was the victim of NTF sabotage?

Who said it had to be NTF sabotage? It could have been GTVA/SOC people that they just swept under the rug (or let hang out to dry).
Well, it was in direct response to this question:
So instead of going through the bother of sabotaging the Colossus, why couldn't the Iceni have jumped out behind the Knossos, where the Colossus couldn't get into range with its main guns?
So... you said it was NTF sabotage. :P

Uh, that wasn't me that said that. That was the original poster, "Thisisaverylongusername".

How do you know Bosch hates the GTVA?

He says this in one of his monologues:
Quote
What my enemies will never understand is that my rebellion is about my love for humanity and not my hatred of Vasudans.

So even though the rebellion was a smoke screen, he did believe in its core ideals. He hated the GTVA, even if it was only because of the V part.
Whoops, not sure how that quote screwed up like that. Still, the point is that in context, NTF sabotage was being discussed.

Anyway, while that quote could be interpreted to say that he hates the Vasudans even though that's not why he's rebelling, it could also be interpreted to say that he never hated Vasudans at all. What it is not is evidence that Bosch hated the GTVA.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Darius on December 10, 2014, 10:14:16 pm
I thought Bosch was quite obviously portrayed as being motivated by pragmatism rather than emotion? Not that he hated vasudans but that he saw no future with them, and it was his followers who were angry and resentful.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: NGTM-1R on December 10, 2014, 10:50:07 pm
He says this in one of his monologues:

Quote
What my enemies will never understand is that my rebellion is about my love for humanity and not my hatred of Vasudans.

So even though the rebellion was a smoke screen, he did believe in its core ideals. He hated the GTVA, even if it was only because of the V part.

That quote does not state he hates Vasudans. It states that the common perception of him rebelling because of his hating Vasudans is wrong.

Now, there is a certain David Duke (http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/david-duke)-ishness to that statement, but given the way Bosch throws his entire rebellion under the bus in the end it's hard to think he's a real ideologue preaching things he really believes.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: qwadtep on December 11, 2014, 12:48:20 pm
He mentions in the same monologue that he has created in the NTF a monster that he is powerless to stop. Bosch hates Vasudans and believes humanity's salvation lies apart from them, but that doesn't mean he condones his smokescreen taking on a life of its own as a campaign of genocide. Bosch allows his militant followers to be crushed once they've served their purpose, preventing further bloodshed.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Megawolf492 on December 11, 2014, 08:37:29 pm
He mentions in the same monologue that he has created in the NTF a monster that he is powerless to stop. Bosch hates Vasudans and believes humanity's salvation lies apart from them, but that doesn't mean he condones his smokescreen taking on a life of its own as a campaign of genocide. Bosch allows his militant followers to be crushed once they've served their purpose, preventing further bloodshed.

I agree with this. The war (btw, does it have a name, even unofficially?) was probably killing more humans than Vasudans. Even though the war wasn't his main goal, he still wanted to end it on his terms (well, as best as it could be). The NTF could have held up in one of their core systems for a few more months (until the Colossus rumbled in), especially when the GTVA was occupied with the Shivans. Bosch could have made it to the portal when not everyone was waiting for him.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 05:06:49 am
I'm in the camp agnostic regarding Bosch hatred of vasudans, borderline atheist at it. More like reminds me of the kind of the Big Lie theme amongst big dictators, in which a Big Lie (a myth) is enacted to rile people up and get them moving in the directions you want them to. Bosch used the hatred to his own ends that had nothing to do with Vasudans at all. All of his internal talk is focused on the Shivans and the one single mention he has of the Vasudans is when he denies his professed public intentions. His heart is 100% on the Shivan Question, not the Vasudan Question. He merely uses the VQ to get answers to his SQ, because he couldn't do so otherwise.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: The E on December 12, 2014, 06:12:43 am
Here's a thought: Bosch has been an agent provocateur all along. GTVA High Command knows that there's a growing anti-Vasudan sentiment among the human population, and they know that communication with Shivans via ETAK is possible.

However, there's a problem: If they came out openly about wanting to communicate with the  Shivans, there would be an enormous backlash from the Vasudan side, seeing as they're still sour about the whole dead homeworld thing. In comes Bosch with a plan: Use the existing antipathy against the Zods to establish a new faction, one that can be used as a lightning rod for said antipathy by drawing in the most extreme people, commit atrocities that make the moderates and undecided ones go back to GTVA proper, and develop ETAK under said faction's umbrella. Then, he argues, it doesn't matter if the zods find out about it and get pissed, seeing as they're already plenty pissed about all the zod murdering. Once Colossus is operational, we can mop up the NTF, while at the same time seeing where ETAK leads us. Afterwards, any results from the ETAK project can be either disavowed or used, depending on what they are.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 06:31:01 am
Yeah, that's the other extreme. Tin Foil Hat territory, the whole mentality of "this was a huge spectacle sham, it was actually all over under control" that birthers and truthers share.

I don't think "Monsters" can be tamed that way, nor do I think anyone inside the GTVA would ever believe that it could be tamed that way AND simultaneously just trust this Bosch dude to play all the cards nicely like that. Wild cards like Bosch are never to be trusted.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 12, 2014, 10:07:03 am
Or cards like Osama bin Laden or Sadaam Hussein?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 10:34:29 am
Would you trust Osama or Saddam with such a plan?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 12, 2014, 10:38:06 am
Not now, no. Did we back them vs the USSR and Iran before? Yes. In other words, once you invest power into an independent card, if the card (or in the card Bosch's case, the movement he created) gets out of hand, it can be rather messy to clean up. 
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 10:47:26 am
Pretty sure my point was not just to throw power into a wild card, but especially with such a convoluted plan to boot. In Osama's case, that would be akin to hire the guy to take planes to Manhattan so that the US government could pursue a war in the middle east. But instead of doing just that, also give him the chance to have full blown destroyers, cruisers and lots of planes at his disposal, but it's all right, it's all under control!
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 12, 2014, 11:03:40 am
... This is Command we're talking about here.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 11:08:34 am
Right, I understand your point, especially if you consider The_E's version of "GTVA", by which I mean Blue Planet's, wherein they have all these supercomputers making huge calculations about these kinds of movements and so on. I still stand to the idea that this kind of "Batman-esque" closed web of manipulations to get everyone to do what you want to do is not my interpretation of Volition's GTVA Command (at all).
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on December 12, 2014, 12:40:47 pm
Right, I understand your point, especially if you consider The_E's version of "GTVA", by which I mean Blue Planet's, wherein they have all these supercomputers making huge calculations about these kinds of movements and so on.
I think you're confused; the UEF is known to have supercomputers analyzing, for example, economic patterns, but I can't recall any mention of the GTVA doing the same.

That said, The E's post doesn't seem to be describing Blue Planet's GTVA, although... perhaps if they viewed Capella as a comprehensive failure of the ETAK concept...
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 01:07:38 pm
I'm not confused, the whole reason for the Sol incursion is given by the plot that directly tells us that the GTVA command ran lots of scenarios for what would happen when the gate opened, and because all the results pointed to a massive ideological and demographical problem that wouldn't be contained by Command, they chose war. This is basic BP canon, look it up.

I also didn't say he was bringing BP up. *I* brought it up. And I didn't understand your last sentence.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on December 12, 2014, 01:44:28 pm
I'm not confused, the whole reason for the Sol incursion is given by the plot that directly tells us that the GTVA command ran lots of scenarios for what would happen when the gate opened, and because all the results pointed to a massive ideological and demographical problem that wouldn't be contained by Command, they chose war. This is basic BP canon, look it up.
Perhaps you should take your own advice; there is no reference to supercomputers running projections. There may have been, but for all we know, it could be a network of Nagari operatives or something completely different. There's simply no canon reference to what you describe that I can find.

I also didn't say he was bringing BP up. *I* brought it up. And I didn't understand your last sentence.
Did... did you forget the wording you just used and I just quoted?
especially if you consider The_E's version of "GTVA", by which I mean Blue Planet's
That sure sounds like you're saying the version of the GTVA he just described is Blue Planet's version of the GTVA. If that's not what you were saying, then... what were you saying?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: The E on December 12, 2014, 01:55:45 pm
For the record? I was not talking about the BP GTVA.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 12, 2014, 05:46:00 pm
Admiral, you're confused. Let's get things straight here.

1. I don't think Freespace's GTVA is portrayed with the kind of "prescience" technology that would enable the kind of decision by command to give Bosch such a role as described above in FS2.

2. The closest of such ability was portrayed in Blue Planet as I described above, regardless of your inability to find any reference to super computers. Such scenarios were modeled and thoroughly ran to see any other way outs. There was none other than war. This was widely discussed in other threads so your denial here is baffling.

3. I made the connection between 1 and 2 in jest, not to be taken so seriously.

4. Despite 3, Blue Planet does not have a monopoly on the idea.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on December 12, 2014, 06:49:54 pm
Admiral, you're confused.
...In your opinion.

Let's get things straight here.

1. I don't think Freespace's GTVA is portrayed with the kind of "prescience" technology that would enable the kind of decision by command to give Bosch such a role as described above in FS2.

2. The closest of such ability was portrayed in Blue Planet as I described above, regardless of your inability to find any reference to super computers. Such scenarios were modeled and thoroughly ran to see any other way outs. There was none other than war. This was widely discussed in other threads so your denial here is baffling.

3. I made the connection between 1 and 2 in jest, not to be taken so seriously.

4. Despite 3, Blue Planet does not have a monopoly on the idea.
1. Nothing about The E's hypothetical requires anything even remotely resembling "prescience".

2. "It was widely discussed" != "This is basic BP canon, look it up."

Look, all you had to say was, "I was just making a joke; I didn't actually mean The E was describing Blue Planet's GTVA." That's not what you said. Instead, you acted like a presumptive jackass (who, by the way, still hasn't linked to anything confirming that the GTVA ran simulations on supercomputers; I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm just saying it's not explicitly stated anywhere that I could find).
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: NGTM-1R on December 12, 2014, 10:47:38 pm
The Plan

Admiral Ahmose suggests, by the fact he was violating orders, that the Vasudan command structure would have to be in on this plan as well.

And honestly there's very little reason to think this works given the dynamics of the Pre-NTF GTVA. The Vasudan economy recovered quickly. The Terran economy did not. That's one of the reasons for the resentment. The Vasudans rebuilt their military quickly. The Terrans did not. The Vasudans retained a unified military structure and the built-in institutional experience to control large-scale military operations and logistics across a wide-spread area of space. The Terrans would have lost most of that in the factional period.

What I'm saying here is it's very likely Admiral Petrarch is taking his orders from a Vasudan. Given the recent history of both races I would be really, really surprised to learn that the upper command and staff levels of the GTVA's military aren't heavily skewed towards Vasudans.

... This is Command we're talking about here.  :rolleyes:

I have spent enough time on this subject, debunking this line of thought, that I really begin to feel anyone who spouts it and has been here as long as you have is deserving only of a kick in the balls. But that's both impractical and too vicious.

Command has shown itself to always be capable and intelligent within the bounds of its knowledge; the existence of the Sathanas fleet was in no way a predictable issue and many of the other "stupidities" Command gets accused of are no such thing. I wrote an entire essay about this once. I have no idea where you were that week, but I really do recommend going and finding it; Command takes reasonable precautions against known threats. Sometimes those don't work; that is life. Sometimes the threats are beyond any kind of predictability; even then, Command manages the situation well and has a workable plan to save what can be saved.

These people are not stupid. If anything they're downright heroic considering a lot of people would have simply shut down and declared "all is lost" after the Sathanas Fleet came into the picture. Command not only didn't do that, it managed to craft a workable solution in an extremely short amount of time. (Put another way, Command managed to beat the Outside Context Problem, something originally described as "the sort of thing most civilizations encounter in the way a sentence encounters a full stop.")
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 13, 2014, 04:47:43 am
Admiral, I never reported any member here outside of bots, am proud of that tradition and will keep it despite your responses, but regarding my alleged lying about BP's GTVA supercomputers Here's a quote from the fiction:

Quote
Furthermore, the appeal of the Ubuntu ideology was so great that GTVA sociopsychologists predicted massive conversion amongst a populace already yearning to abandon failed colony worlds and emigrate to Earth. The military might of the GTVA would be brought down by ideology once more.

Under the guidance of President Toqueville, as advised by a panel of psychohistorians and sociopsychologists, the Security Council elected to enact its most severe contingency: the invasion of Sol. This contingency was hotly debated but ultimately selected for several reasons...

"Psychohistorians" is a reference to Asimov's Foundation and their computational technology of calculating futures on a wider social scale.

If you keep annoying me with your obsessive Shenanigans keep in mind I won't respond, kthnks.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: AdmiralRalwood on December 13, 2014, 05:05:57 am
regarding my alleged lying
:rolleyes: Please point me to any instance of me accusing you of lying or "making up" supercomputers.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 13, 2014, 08:29:47 am
So instead of apologising for your behaviour you now deny you accused me of lying. But I'm the jackass. Duly noted and memorised for future reference.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: The E on December 13, 2014, 08:44:03 am
Luis, you were the one accusing Ralwood of accusing you of lying. Cool it. As far as I can tell, all Ralwood was saying was that there is no direct reference to a certain detail in BP's background you posited to exist (something, I have to add, not exactly relevant to this particular discussion).
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 13, 2014, 09:56:16 am
If you unblock me, I can PM you. For everyone else lurking or interacting on this ridiculous idiocy, it's over.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 17, 2014, 06:39:48 am


... This is Command we're talking about here.  :rolleyes:
I have spent enough time on this subject, debunking this line of thought, that I really begin to feel anyone who spouts it and has been here as long as you have is deserving only of a kick in the balls.

I dunno,  probably IRL?  :rolleyes:

But that's both impractical and too vicious.

Agreed, thank you for being civil about it.  (No that was not sarcasm).
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Luis Dias on December 17, 2014, 09:49:51 am
The issue here is how Command has had this fame of being absolutely incompetent or lazy or dumb or annoyingly slow with regards to the events of FS2, but I would agree with NG that all the more careful analysis done here by many commenters actually support the exact opposite conclusion, that Command was cautiously optimistic in their endeavours, that they had made a proper risk analysis and decided correclty to porsue exploration with a small risk of a backlash, and that even when the Shivans proved themselves to be way out of proportion, Command proved to have substantial resources prepared and used them appropriately.

I've always agreed with that assessment, although I somewhat think that given we have access to a very minimal size of intel assets regarding these questions from GTVA, we are really just making informed guesses to their smartness and competence, so in the end it's somewhat subjective.
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 21, 2014, 05:53:17 pm
I believe my issues were more with with the small annoyances (can't remember exactly, but that feels right). Such as SHTF but we won't change mission parameters. Our something.

If I ever get some spare time and a system that FS doesn't decide to obsessively love the Intel over the nVidia card despite being told not to, maybe I'll play through again. (side note, I have to try a trunk build to see if that fixes it).
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: Mongoose on December 21, 2014, 08:18:50 pm
Can't you just disable the onboard video in your BIOS, so that FSO can't see it in the first place?
Title: Re: Iceni question
Post by: jr2 on December 21, 2014, 11:10:42 pm
No option in the BIOS , unfortunately :doubt:

It's a Toshiba Satellite  P775-S7160 (http://support.toshiba.com/support/modelHome?freeText=3253822)