hmm, this goes in direct contradiction to some other article I read. That one indicated taht 9/11 videos (good ones) when scrutinized show that the WTC buildings underwent a systematic destruction top-down, implying that it was a set-up (bombs) rather than an airplane strike... also arguing the WTC could have sustained plane crashes without falling so dramatically.
I'll find it.... sometime...
'nyway, the article does hold some truth-ish-ness, Bush and his administration seems to be blatantly evading the truth and questions (was funny watching his speech yesterday) about the truth with their classical "but he's had 12 years to disarm" line. (and of course the whole weapon thing is a big evasion of some sort) However I'm not sure if the US is necessarily trying to keep peoples eyes away from Osama...
