Author Topic: Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS? (Read 1573 times)

Starks · **on:** November 21, 2003, 09:52:07 am

I think Source Forge is more well known than Warpcore, if we add our project to SF, we are bound to draw some extra attention.

Starks · **Reply #1 on:** November 21, 2003, 01:48:37 pm

I'd like some responses.

Goober5000 · **Reply #2 on:** November 21, 2003, 04:44:39 pm

Be patient. There was only a 4 hour difference between your two posts.

For my part, I vote no. The Gamespy release is going to bring us plenty of publicity anyway.

Inquisitor · **Reply #3 on:** November 21, 2003, 05:11:38 pm

why?

and I have concerns about the licensing on SF, last I checkewd you had to get special permission to post wierdly licensed code there.

We have almost 2 years of progress in the current CVS. If aomeone wants to open a SF account and redirect to us, that migh accomplish what you are looking for...

Setekh · **Reply #4 on:** November 21, 2003, 11:50:58 pm

Inq put it well. Additionally, we have enough on our hands securing the 3.6 and 3.6.1 stable builds, and getting the documentation down for the already-scheduled FP release. SF can wait.

Johnmike · **Reply #5 on:** November 22, 2003, 10:23:30 am

How about put it up on SF after you get the 3.6.1 release.

Goober5000 · **Reply #6 on:** November 22, 2003, 05:28:15 pm

We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

News:

Poll

Does having our SCP on Source Forge sound like a good idea?

Author Topic: Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS? (Read 1573 times)

Starks

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Starks

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Goober5000

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Inquisitor

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Setekh

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Johnmike

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?

Goober5000

Should we use Source Forge as a second CVS?