Author Topic: Just another bit of trivia  (Read 2107 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Just another bit of trivia
I know you've wondered how fast the various ships travel while they fly around blow each other up.

Well, using the Hercules as an example, we see that the Herc has a maximum sustained forward velocity of 50 meters/sec.

This translates to 180 kilmeters per hour.

1000/50=20 second to travel 1 kilometer

60/20=3 kilometers per minute

3*60 = 180 kilometers per hour or 111.84 miles per hour.

This is not really that fast, especially considering how fast aerial engagements take place in modern warfare.
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Just another bit of trivia
Here's something for you...

The most distant man made objects, the Voyager probes, are probably one of the fastest too...

Voyager 1 has a speed of about 3.6 AU per year while Voyager 2 has one of about 3.3 AU per year. That's about 17.1 kilometers per second (!) and 16.8 kilometers per second!! But, the highest are the helios probes, which have once reached a speed of 70.2 kilometers per second!!

The fastest combat jet has a very tiny percentage of that (of course), it moves at about 0.94 kilometers per second.

Just some random facts to annoy you :D :sigh:

Think of the Herc as a tank (an extremelly slow one) rather than a space or aircraft. :doubt:
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Lightspeed

  • Light Years Ahead
  • 212
Just another bit of trivia
something that keeps within reasonable acceleration and deceleration i guess -- you don't want to kill that pilot inside the herc :)

Plus, any faster speeds would a) screw up the size problems even more or b) make it impossible for you to hit even a cruiser :p
Modern man is the missing link between ape and human being.

 

Offline Setekh

  • Jar of Clay
  • 215
    • Hard Light Productions
Just another bit of trivia
Quote
Originally posted by Ghostavo
Think of the Herc as a tank (an extremelly slow one) rather than a space or aircraft. :doubt:


I have no problems with that. The Herc sure looks like a tank. ;)
- Eddie Kent Woo, Setekh, Steak (of Steaks), AWACS. Seriously, just pick one.
HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS, now V3.0. Bringing Modders Together since January 2001.
THE HARD LIGHT ARRAY. Always makes you say wow.

 
Just another bit of trivia
Well, I don't think that if humanity was ever to create space-fighter craft, they would be controlled by computers, rather than pilots. I think it's safe to assume that by the long time it would take to build an interstellar fleet, we would also have created the technology to relieve humans from piloting the spacecraft.
The shortcut to impossibility does exist, we just have to find it! I will...

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Just another bit of trivia
I think the only problem problem would be programming a computer to act imaginatively....  I think to have a fighter that could 'think outside the box' and improvise, you'd need to develop an AI to the point of near-sentience... the point being that, aside form the technological difficulties, would that type of AI even be co-operative?

 

Offline Lightspeed

  • Light Years Ahead
  • 212
Just another bit of trivia
*views this from a shivan viewpoint* :p

why waste expensive robots when there's insane humans who want to waste their lives?

Humans are much cheaper, and they're more effective.
Modern man is the missing link between ape and human being.

 

Offline Falcon

  • 29
Just another bit of trivia
I don't belive we will ever come close to near-sentience.

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Just another bit of trivia
Quote
Originally posted by Falcon
I don't belive we will ever come close to near-sentience.


So true... :rolleyes:
Computers already control most of the airplanes functions... it's only a matter of time until they control all the ships functions and start "thinking".

e.g. look at the A.I. of any game. Not the scripted things... the A.I. itself... now imagine what a military A.I. would look with our current technology.
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Just another bit of trivia
Phear CNN in the future...

'And today, American tanks repeatedly rammed the enemy positions whilst firing point blank.'

Sources said losses would have been lower had the tanks not continuously driven into each other.

:)

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Just another bit of trivia
Quote
Originally posted by Ghostavo


So true... :rolleyes:
Computers already control most of the airplanes functions... it's only a matter of time until they control all the ships functions and start "thinking".

e.g. look at the A.I. of any game. Not the scripted things... the A.I. itself... now imagine what a military A.I. would look with our current technology.


Coputers don't really have any true control, though...it's basically a straight translation of the pilots input to respective output functions, or simple actions like correcting flight instability.  It's not something that requires 'intelligence' per-se - it basically boils down to mathematical formulas.

Remember that the AI in games is still very basic.... it works well withing a very limited context and often boils down to a simple finite state machine.

Even given that, the level designer often has to provide 'hints' to the AI on what context to use - i.e. Call of Duty uses nodes which indicate suitable cover, etc, which the AI uses in deciding upon actions.  The data given to the AI on it's location, what's happening, etc is all in a purpose built format.... in real life, this would be done trhough stuff like visual recognition-  and there is no current way for a computer to look at an image and actually understand what it is.... the only forms of visual recognition are based on colour, etc properties or (in the case of web search engines) captions/text nearby , rather than content.

Unfortunately(or not), we are still massively far from automated military hardware, etc.  the current level is basically trying to get robots that think and act like insects - i.e. can pathfind, etc.

  

Offline Hippo

  • Darth water-horse
  • 211
  • Grazing.
    • All Hands to War
Just another bit of trivia
Speed?





HERE
VBB Survivor -- 387 Posts -- July 3 2001 - April 12 2002
VWBB Survivor -- 100 Posts -- July 10 2002 - July 10 2004

AHTW