Originally posted by Fear
so u are going to compare doom2 to doom3 aswell? you cant compare a game to a classic, because for its time it had superb graphic, and for its time it had the best storyline and owns movies. and for it time it had the best music \voice acting around...
well you get the point i just think that until starcraft2 will come out u cant compare DOW to SC1 unless Dow will become classic when SC2 will be gold
of course you can compare the two. they're both RTS, they both have the same engine setup, i mean, i don't know, you don't seem to have much logic, so arguing with you is probably pointless, but you DEFINATELY can compare the two games, and i'm telling you, that Dawn of War beats Starcraft in almost every sense. don't start defending Starcraft now, becuase i've been more of a Starcraft fan than anyone on this forum... check my Battle.net profile: 3000+ games played, and that's just on multiplayer.
Also, Starcraft didn't set any precedents really... it was a great game, still is, but there were other RTS games that came out at the time, such as age of empires, Warcraft, command and conquer, etc. etc. Starcraft just got really popular because it was a good game. it had well rounded races, good graphics, nice story, etc.
Anyway, point is: you can compare the two... Dawn of War > Starcraft. Just like you can compare a 2002 Thunderbird to a 1959 Thunderbird... one's a classic, but so what. big deal. you can still compare them. and i still say: With Dawn of War's release, MANY starcraft fans are going to be switching to it. myself included. just get on Starcraft battle.net and go to a public chat channel and mention Dawn of War, and see how many people start talking about it. Starcraft's multiplayer popularity is going to start decreasing rapidly... watch. the ONLY thing that Starcraft has on its side at the moment is that it's a lot cheaper to buy the game than dawn of war, and older computers can play it. other than that, everyone's going to be at least TRYING dawn of war. myself included.
Kthx.