Author Topic: MS and Sender-ID  (Read 615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+pushes+spam-filtering+technology/2100-7355_3-5758365.html?tag=nefd.top?headline=Microsoft~pushes~spam-filtering~technology

Microsoft is planning to enforce Sender-ID in its hotmail services by trashing (at the server level, it won't reach your spam box even) e-mails without Sender-ID tags. The problem is, Sender-ID is widely unsupported among webmail services and e-mail applications. Particularly, it's incompatible with free/open-source software. The Apache foundation, they make the most popular webserver on the www, has announced they won't be supporting Sender-ID at all because it's incompatible with the Apache license.

What's even worse is Sender-ID doesn't work very well for what it's advertised to do (i.e. preventing spam). Lots of spam comes from legitimate looking domains. Plus, it'll hamper legitimate mail too. For example, it'll break mailing lists. Since mailing list posts are sent by the mailing list server, the e-mail from domain won't match the list server's domain. That'll get rejected with Sender-ID.

So hotmail users, go switch to gmail or yahoo... or else your non-MSN friends won't be able to e-mail you. :p
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman

 
I would've thought this a suicidal plan for Microsoft... surely it'll send Hotmail users to Gmail in droves?

 

Offline Unknown Target

  • Get off my lawn!
  • 212
  • Push.Pull?
Or Yahoo, which offers 1 gig of space now, and gets very little, if any spam if you're careful.

  

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Microsoft offers a 'service' using a 'feature' which only it supports, and thus attempts to either handicap competitors or force them to spend money on unecessary compatibility tech?

Never.......