Author Topic: First Longhorn Virus!  (Read 779 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline redmenace

  • 211
First Longhorn Virus!
http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20050804_155825.html

Sheesh! It is just now gone private beta!
Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.
              -Frederic Bastiat

 
Exactly. The point of Beta versions is to weed out loopholes like this.

Good thing it turned up now and not after release, isn't it?
'And anyway, I agree - no sig images means more post, less pictures. It's annoying to sit through 40 different sigs telling about how cool, deadly, or assassin like a person is.' --Unknown Target

"You know what they say about the simplest solution."
"Bill Gates avoids it at every possible opportunity?"
-- Nuke and Colonol Drekker

 

Offline redmenace

  • 211
yes, but I found it amazing that already they are trying to **** up computers.
Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.
              -Frederic Bastiat

 

Offline Admiral LSD

  • 27
  • Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
    • http://adphq.dyndns.org
It's hardly surprising. MS software is well-known to contain all manner of nasties and even if it didn't, there'd still be teams of people actively trying to find and exploit potential holes simply because of their high public profile. Linux and Mac advocates proudly list "resistance to viruses" among the reasons why we should all flock in their directions but the truth is, there are just as many potential flaws there as there are on the MS side of the fence (if not more). The only reason they don't get as much press is that no-one really cares to look for them simply because neither have the glory attached to it that finding yet another MS bug does. You can bet dollars to doughnuts that, whenever Linux develops serious market share, the same thing will start happening there too.
00:19  * Snail cockslaps BotenAnna
00:19 -!- Snail was kicked from #hard-light by BotenAnna [Don't touch me there! RAPE!!!]

15:36 <@Stealth_T1g4h> MASSIVE PENIS IN YOUR ASS Linux

I normally enjoy your pornographic website... - Stealth
Get Internet Explorer!

 

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
Not really. Linux users don't run as Administrator.

BTW: Apparently these are simply monad shell scripts. Nothing amazing. It doesn't actually exploit the monad software.
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
Neither do all Windows users. It's about competence of the user.

 

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
That's really not the point. Many applications on Windows don't work well without Administrator priveledges or assume that it's there. It's a developer attitude issue. I guess I should've said "Linux users don't have to run as Administrator".
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
That's where "run as" comes in. Although I have to agree, it's inconvenient. Luckily Longhorn is supposed to eventually bring a lot of improvement in this area.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
I'm not sure it'll go about it the right way.  I think it's becoming more of an issue of denying than facilitating access (I think pure sockets is an example) for applications.... to me an OS, if it has to implement security, shouldn't do so by denying facilities.

  
Well, taking a look at the features slated for Vista, you'll see that it has an improved Reduced Privilege Account, one that supposedly works unlike Windows XP's useless one.


They're also moving to get rid of the registry and will implement a "virtual registry", which can be on a per account basis, to support legacy programs.


In any case, they're trying =P


As for these "viruses", they're just shell scripts.  I wouldn't be surprised by a Vista virus but these really aren't viruses.