[aldo_14]

Of note; earlier versions of 'Of Pandas and People' used the terms 'creator' and 'creationism' where 'intelligent designer' and 'intelligent design' are used.  This was IIRc one of the key points in the Dover trial when referring to that textbook.

As we can see by that quote, even if this was a scientific hypothesis, it's conclusively disproven by fossil evidence of transitional forms (amongst other things).

[Kosh]

here kid, let me explain it to you in more detail... maybe i can get you to see the similarities.

1) Judge rules homosexual marriages cannot take place - in that homosexual couples can not get married.
2) Judge rules ID cannot be taught in schools - in that ID can not be taught in schools

The first ruling was law based, the second was philisophocal. Call me a kid again and I will report your post. Your arrogance is appaling, and I will not tolerate being belittled.

they're both rulings, now don't try to be smart and say "one's a science and one's not"... that's stupid.

You're saying that the truth is stupid?

[Black Wolf]

Stealth: Simple question - Where is the science in the Homosexual marriage ruling?

If you can't find it  then surely it's absolutely irrelevant (rather than the "almost absolutely irrelevant" that it falls under ATM.