which is exactly why those apple factories should be viewed as a general improvement to the quality of life in the region not a total capitalist vice. they provide some sort of opportunity in a place where there previously was none.
The arguement against being that they amount to very little more than the abuse of a poverty-stricken population; the opportunity to work for pathetically low wages due to desperation. I'm sure I'm not the only person seeing correlations with this and 19thC woolen mills, etc.
That, and the whole hypocracy thing vis-a-vis apples' desired public image.
(However, the source is the
Mail on Sunday, the sunday version of a rather despicable tabloid with racist/bigoted tendencies and a seemingly very low opinion of using actual facts in news stories.)
