Author Topic: Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary  (Read 1094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary
http://redtape.msnbc.com/2006/12/why_cell_phone_.html


Quote
A federal Freedom of Information Act request for the data, filed in August by MSNBC.com, has been rejected by the agency. The stated reasons: Release of the information could help terrorists plan attacks against the United States, and it would harm the companies involved.



I have lots of things to say, but none of it is good.
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 
Re: Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary
I fail to see how that information could possibly aid terrorists...  :wtf:
"You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?" -DEATH, Discworld

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Re: Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary
I fail to see how that information could possibly aid terrorists...  :wtf:

NATIONAL SECURITY
lol wtf

 
Re: Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary
I fail to see how that information could possibly aid terrorists...  :wtf:

well, like, you know, if brittany told mahmoud about candi's hair style falling without a droppe call then, like, totally, OH MY GAWD the whole, like, free world economic system would, like, fall to it's knees

seriously though, it's another cronyism, same as electric v. hydrogen cars, electric cars are bad for industry, good for consumers, knowing the actual numbers on cell phone reliability is bad for companies, good for consumers

the government lies to protect companies because they have more power, they have the money to buy politicians into office, keep the companies happy, stay in office, anger the corporations, fail, lose an INCREDIBLY cooshie job

easy choice for an old man with lots of ambition and a legacy to look after really, especially if it's all he knows


edit: unbelievably oversimplified for brevity

  

Offline Getter Robo G

  • 211
  • Elite Super Robot Pilot
Re: Complaining about cell phones is counter-revolutionary
quote - [In its initial answer to MSNBC.com’s FOIA request, FCC officials cited only one reason for the denial: “competitive harm” to companies involved.]


Really? We live in a capitalist society. So by seeing these reports consumers would logically go with reliable companies instead of the ones rated to continually have piss poor service? Yeah, I guess that can be considered "Competitive harm".

WTF?! If you are a piece of SH*T company I don't want to give you my business, but I guess Colin Powell's son is to retarded to understand that! (bastard drove my Howard off terrestrial radio)   :lol:
"Don't think of it as being out-numbered, think of it as having a WIDE target selection!"

"I am the one and ONLY Star Dragon..."
Proof for the noobs:  Member Search

[I'm Just an idea guy, NOT: a modeler, texturer, or coder... Word of advice, "Watch out for the ducks!"]

Robotech II - Continuing...
FS2 Trek - Snails move faster than me...
Star Blazers: Journey to Iscandar...
FS GUNDAM - The Myth lives on... :)