Author Topic: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought  (Read 3401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Unknown Target

  • Get off my lawn!
  • 212
  • Push.Pull?
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
the real problem is that the creationist argument relies on 'god', when in fact such a god does not exist.  kinda makes the whole argument kinda silly.

Saying that "god" doesn't exist has just as much truth value as saying he does exist. You can't just say he doesn't exist and call the argument that he does exist "silly" without justification. And even if you provide justification, you can never completely remove the concept - which is why the debate continues to this day and will probably continue forever.

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
well first you're wrong and second it's not because your debating skills suck but because your position sucks
Davin's position doesn't 'suck', and it's rather offensive for you to call it such. His position is laughably wrong, but it does not 'suck' in any way, shape or form.

Seriously Davin, there are times when you just have to swallow your pride and admit that you were completely and utterly incorrect in your baseless assumptions, and no amount of pigheadedness will make up for it.

It's dumb and objectively false, not based on anything and he does not want to discuss it? The position sucks, because it is wrong, and it sucks because he said he is unwilling to check it? I mean, if that does not qualify as sucking then what does.
lol wtf

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
the real problem is that the creationist argument relies on 'god', when in fact such a god does not exist.  kinda makes the whole argument kinda silly.

The problem isn't the reliance on God so much as the reliance on a God who creates the universe and then goes to extraordinary lengths to obfuscate that he did it, only to then write a great big book telling everyone he did it.

Even if you're religious a much more sensible option is that God simply waited for humans to evolve before revealing his existence.

If I didn't know better I'd swear that creationism was a galactic equivalent of the show Space Cadets and right now they're at the stage where they're trying to figure out who is stupid enough to fall for the next stage.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
I mean, if that does not qualify as sucking then what does.
Well I could post a picture but I would get banned.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
I mean, if that does not qualify as sucking then what does.
Well I could post a picture but I would get banned.

oh darling you know how to play me like a mandolin <3
lol wtf

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought


Pff, that's so unbelievable.  You'd never see a US president wearing a pink t-shirt.

  

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Re: Human Chimpanzee split occured later than thought
If Darvin or anyone else is interested, I found a good video series on the internet that talks about what science is, what it is not, how it works, and also the terminology (like the word "theory") that people keep getting confused by. It also talks about the religious points of view, and also why "Intelligent Design" is not accepted by the general scientific community.

In fact I challenge Darvin and/or any of his/her friends to look at everything in there, and the come back here and talk to us about it.
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key