Author Topic: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.  (Read 2628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Turnsky

  • FOXFIRE Artisté
  • 211
  • huh?.. Who?.. hey you kids, git off me lawn!
who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
now it looks like games like need for speed and gran-turismo are copping the blame too, now.

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,23663,21405617-7486,00.html
« Last Edit: March 21, 2007, 02:25:30 am by Turnsky »
   //Warning\\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
do not torment the sleep deprived artist, he may be vicious when cornered,
in case of emergency, administer caffeine to the artist,
he will become docile after that,
and less likely to stab you in the eye with a mechanical pencil
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
Ummmm, No! FPS's weren't the ONLY scapegoat! Did you forget the GTA series?  :P
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
Also, is it racing games making people drive faster, or is it that speed freaks like fast racing games.

Looks a bit like putting the cart before the horse to me.

 
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
Jebus.

Firstly I want to know who carries out these studies. For what purpose and what cost.

And secondly, is it not bloody obvious that maybe, just maybe, the people who play these games and are more prone to 'risk-taking' are actually drawn to playing these games because they were born with a 'risk-taking' personality? I mean do these people want to turn us into lifeless automatons?

Edit: Bah! You just clinched it Flipside.
Watch out for the Guns! They'll getcha!

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
corelation is not causation
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
Plus, name one person who wouldn't drive like a wee bit of nutter on a 'computer simulator' just because they can?  It's a bit different between going 'ooh, let's see if I can overtake this crudely polygonized truck' and doing it in reality.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
I've driven like a maniac in just about every driving game I've ever played (including pursuing such wonderful activities as driving the wrong way around the track and causing 30-car pileups in NASCAR games), and I've been doing so since the ripe old age of 10 or 11.

In real life, I drive my little Ford Escort like a grandmother at 2 miles under the speed limit.

So much for correlations.

 

Offline MarkN

  • 26
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
What none of you seem to have realised is that in the second test, the test situation was it was, itself, another racing game, and therefore had no real consequences. If on the other hand there had been a prize for the safest driver, or these had been real situations on the road, I think that the results would have been very different.

  

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: who thought FPS's were the only scapegoat.
What none of you seem to have realised is that in the second test, the test situation was it was, itself, another racing game, and therefore had no real consequences. If on the other hand there had been a prize for the safest driver, or these had been real situations on the road, I think that the results would have been very different.

er, I did.

Plus, name one person who wouldn't drive like a wee bit of nutter on a 'computer simulator' just because they can?  It's a bit different between going 'ooh, let's see if I can overtake this crudely polygonized truck' and doing it in reality.