[Spoon]

For the record when I tested it, I added it to ships.tbl not in a seperate .tbm

[Zacam]

Should still apply regardless of whether it was in a TBL or merged to a TBL by a TBM because in the end, it all goes to the same place.

But good to know, and just to make sure I'm not wrong, I'll test via TBL as well.

And yup, works when used in a TBL as well.

[SparK]

oh you guys found that too? XD

simple fix is add

Code: [Select]

if(ci->forward < 0.0f)
    ci->forward = -1.0f;
else
    ci->forward = 1.0f;

right after the check on physics.cpp, next to that comment with my name

[Zacam]

Hmm. Not the approach I took, but I'll try it out, seeing as how there is a reported case where in forward AB (vs non-tbm'd for Reverse AB) the falloff back to normal speed is taking _much_ longer.

[Zacam]

Okay, no changes needed to be made. The reported case wasn't a cause of ReverseAB, so I call it good until it's decided to expand it's functionality later.