[Black Wolf]

So the timeline here is, (briefly) consider stalking a girl, then somehow meet the girl, then, what, 3, 4 months later marry her?

You're a nut.

[Snail]

A nut with legendary charm.

[Stealth]

So the timeline here is, (briefly) consider stalking a girl, then somehow meet the girl, then, what, 3, 4 months later marry her?

You're a nut.

Black wolf, i'm getting tired of your pessimissm.  You're clearly jealous, because the only girlfriend you'll ever have is your right hand.  Or possibly your mother.
If you don't want to contribute positively to his thread, then get out of it, you jealous loser.
Thank you.

I may be a nut, but i'm a more successful nut than you'll ever be. deal with it, and don't contribute to this thread again, or i'll have a moderator erase your posts.

[Jeff Vader]

Congrats and all and great to see the thread reaching page 2 before the personal attacks.

Locked.

[Black Wolf]

Black wolf, i'm getting tired of your pessimissm.  You're clearly jealous, because the only girlfriend you'll ever have is your right hand.  Or possibly your mother.
If you don't want to contribute positively to his thread, then get out of it, you jealous loser.
Thank you.

I may be a nut, but i'm a more successful nut than you'll ever be. deal with it, and don't contribute to this thread again, or i'll have a moderator erase your posts.

OK, you need some lessons in how stuff works here. First, you wont "have" anyone do anything. Nobody's at your beck and call, and nobody erases osts on HLP, not without a damned good reason. Second of all, you don't get to tell people what threads they can and can't post in, even if you start them. Thirdly, lying to the community pisses everyone off:

so i may have already been dating her when i posted that original thread... wanted to see the concensus on something that i'd already done, and presenting it as if it were something i was planning (not something i'd done already) seemed the best way to avoid accusations

We've actually dated formally for over 1 year.

i.e. you lied, and then when someone (me) called you on it (as you were either lying about the timeline, or a nut to be getting married after knowing someone for 3 months), you got ****ty. If it weren't for the appearance of abuse of powers, I'd slap a tempban on you myself, as we are supposed to be in a heavy moderation, non-flaming period at the moment.

Finally, the idea that I'm jealous of you is laughable. (IIRC) You're some kind of IT manager in a monogamous relationship in America. I want none of these in my life. Why would I be jealous?



Now, JeffVader has locked this thread, and I'll leave it locked, but I won't deny you right of reply if you want it. PM me, and I'll post anything you want me to.

[Zacam]

Uhm. Not to post on a topic already locked by a moderator, but it is HIGHLY unfair to continue a conversation when the other party can't respond.
(offer to continue in private not withstanding)

Black Wolf: I see where you are coming from in terms of what you are saying. But having it in a PM would have been a LOT better, or even just out right ignoring it.
When somebody is answered to in public, they tend to want to return the answer in public, hence the unfair comment above, and why it probably would have been best to have handled the matter privately via PM or not at all.

Stealth: Uncalled for, in my opinion. I can only hope that your were not being as serious as you read as being there, as I would expect that you would know that it would be your post that would be more likely to draw warning under these circumstances. Though BW has the right of it, we lock, we don't delete (unless you are a spam-bot) and nobody here is at anybodies beck and call.

Both of you: Try and keep it civil, at least in public, k? thx.