Author Topic: Imageshack might not be safe!  (Read 3770 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
imagebin. But imagebin does not allow embedding, making it only usable for a certain range of applications.

Also note that imagebin images have a rather short lifespan.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline mjn.mixael

  • Cutscene Master
  • 212
  • Chopped liver
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
Imagebin is win for quick temporary non compressed image posts.

I use Photobucket for things I don't care about resizing.. then I just my own webspace to host images I want to keep at the highest quality possible...

Solution: you all need your own webspace.
Cutscene Upgrade Project - Mainhall Remakes - Between the Ashes
Youtube Channel - P3D Model Box
Between the Ashes is looking for committed testers, PM me for details.
Freespace Upgrade Project See what's happening.

 
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
Solution: you all need your own webspace.

Quite a few people do have webspace and don't even realize it.

I don't have a lot of positive things to say about Comcast's broadband service, but if it's what you're using, you've got ten gigabytes of upload space included as part of the service.  That space cap is shared with your e-mail inbox, but unless you're regularly sending and receiving some pretty enormous files, e-mail isn't going to eat up much of that cap.

A smaller broadband ISP in my area, Knology, offers ten megabytes of upload space to its customers, also included as part of the normal service.  It's not much, but if you're just putting up a few images to post in a forum thread that will fall off the face of the Earth within a week or two, it's adequate.

It's worth poking around the support section of your ISP's website or reviewing your service agreement, because you might just have access to a much better option than any of these image hosting sites provide.

 

Offline sigtau

  • 29
  • unfortunate technical art assclown
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
If you register for an account on Imageshack, you can get the direct link to your images.  It's not that hard, I've done it before, and I use it primarily to mass-distribute groups of images (see the fractal art topic I made in gendisc a while back).

Imgur, Imagebin, and Tinypic are still going to be forever superior.
Who uses forum signatures anymore?

 
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
And with a little prodding, google docs/drive can also host images, and you can direct link it to forums and stuff.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
photobucket works fine for me. i usually have a bigger issue with images compressed improperly for their content, where no cropping was done, where images are unnecessarily large, or where they were using a sub-optimal format. its not so much how much space an image takes up on a web page, but rather how much time it takes to load the image. images should be as small in filesize as possible to facilitate fast downloading. it should be there before i have time to say this is going too slow.

i dont need 1080p screenshots in png. for example when posting ksp accomplishments, i always halved the resolution and compressed around level 5 quality jpegs before uploading. these loaded instantly for me. digital photos also dont really need to be full resolution and lossless either, for example my sister has this really high end camera with a massive resolution, and shes a moron and doesnt know how to scale or compress, i rather despise looking at images she posts on the net. it takes 30+ seconds to load some of them, and she usually takes lots. not fun. it also doesn't make sense to not crop images when you're trying to show a specific detail. the images need not be identical in size.

im also starting to procuce a lot of engineering diagrams, cuircuit diagrams and **** like that. and im actually going to start saving these images as gifs, because theres not a lot of color detail, and gif supports n bit paletteization where n can be a variety of values. this can lead to pretty small images where color detail is not important. eaglecad diagrams dont seem to need more than a few colors, and using a small paletteized format works great for size reduction. i posted a jpeg of such a diagram a few days ago and it just looked like ****, and png dont make a lot of sense either, but gif does in this case.

tldr: people who dont know how to resize, crop, compress, and use appropriate formats have no buisness posting images on the net.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
And with a little prodding, google docs/drive can also host images, and you can direct link it to forums and stuff.

this changes EVERYTHING

 

Offline mjn.mixael

  • Cutscene Master
  • 212
  • Chopped liver
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
I wonder if Google Drive has similar terms to Dropbox... Dropbox maintains that you aren't supposed to host files there for general download. If they detect too much traffic, they put a hold on your account.
Cutscene Upgrade Project - Mainhall Remakes - Between the Ashes
Youtube Channel - P3D Model Box
Between the Ashes is looking for committed testers, PM me for details.
Freespace Upgrade Project See what's happening.

  
Re: Imageshack might not be safe!
I wonder if Google Drive has similar terms to Dropbox... Dropbox maintains that you aren't supposed to host files there for general download. If they detect too much traffic, they put a hold on your account.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't. I found Google's general terms, and there didn't seem to be any prohibitions against it. And anyway, every file on docs/drive has a "share" option with a link to it.