Orriginally posted by WMCoolmon
It's a very detailed study, much different that the EU. It does point out differences between the Star Destroyer bridges, which IMHO is still fairly important, but I don't recall it ever saying a Star Destroyer was a different class because of its color. And a Star Destroyer drawn different might very well be a new class of Star Destroyer.
Meh... some of it's true, but I don't like it. It ****s with how everything works in your head. Like when you read a book with new names and You pronounce them a certain way like "Tie-co" or "An-till-ees" or "X-eh-cue-ter" or "Zee-lot" and then some smartass comes along and corrects you. It kills it.
And i'm not talking about just the bridges.. I mean like if One of the ships is slightly larger (in drawing) then another Imp Star Deuce, it's now "Anonumous Star Destroyer #169 which is

1.9 km" as apposed to the standard 1.6 or whatever..
And the whole thing about the Executor being longer than the Eclipse
Point is, there's bound to be descripencies when Sci-fi movie maker creates a world, then leaves it for other writers to feast on, there's bound to be descripencies.. so it seems dumb to me to come in and to try to make everything canon to eachother, and canon to the laws of our galaxy/universe.
Nerds with too much time..