Originally posted by ChronoReverse
And why would you need to do that? The A64 3000+ is both cheaper and performs better at games than the P3 3.0C in normal 32bit windows.
I've already stated I'd prefer to get a 2.8C or 2.6C but if you're willing to shell out for a P4 3.2C, then a A64 3000+ would be a better choice.
I don't see any point in paying over the odds for a processor whose performance is still hampered by software standards. It's like buying a 3d card designed for 8x AGP and slapping it on 4x AGP - sure, it's still better... not the difference that there should be.
By the time 64 bit becomes suitably supported, these chips will have gone down in price - and you'll still get improved performance compared to an 32-bit Os.
Personally, I wouldn't touch any Intel chips with a 10-foot clown pole, though. .. and it's a moot point - I'm not touching this Pc till at least the end of the year, when I may spare cash floating about (fingers crossed)
