Author Topic: Hmmmmm....stealthy!  (Read 2283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Singh

  • Hasn't Accomplished Anything Special Or Notable
  • 211
  • Degrees of guilt.
Hmmmmm....stealthy!








"Blessed be the FREDder that knows his sexps."
"Cursed be the FREDder that trusts FRED2_Open."
Dreamed of much, accomplished little. :(

 

Offline Anaz

  • 210
can we get pictures of that on a non-weird background? From what I can tell, it looks pretty good so far.

and on a completely offtopic note...is it stealthy...like moose?
Arrr. I'm a pirate.

AotD, DatDB, TVWP, LM. Ph34r.

You WILL go to warpstorm...

 

Offline Stealth

  • Braiiins...
  • 211
<-----  get stealthy

 
How is it stealthy? The fins on the back would make it's EM signature bigger...and painting it black? Would make it's heat signature sky rocket.

The best stealth design...would be a thin cone/rocket painted white with some radar/sensor deflecting armour...and a cloaking device to top it off ;)

...But it's still kick-arse! :cool: :yes:

 

Offline Corsair

  • Gull Wings Rule
  • 29
Ah, but black is invisible to the eye while white sticks out like a Shivan in Beta Aquilae.
Wash: This landing's gonna get pretty interesting.
Mal: Define "interesting".
Wash: *shrug* "Oh God, oh God, we're all gonna die"?
Mal: This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
There are ways to reduce IR signature, baffles and such. Besides, the best stealth material would be black: if it's going to absorb EM radiation, it's probably going to be black.

Also, since this is apparently still having combat at visual ranges, black is lost against a starfield, and lack of a visual target can really, really screw you up.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

  
aside from all that technical stuff it still looks very cool