Author Topic: Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor  (Read 4221 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Doesn't explain them pooring money into bunker-busting nukes and pulling out of the treaty though does it?
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
No, nor do I defend either of those actions.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

  

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
I'm afraid when it comes to nukes I find my one area of non-liberal policy belief. The nuclear deterrent is just that, a deterrent which has kept the major 1st world nations from engaging in open warfare for over 60 years.

Yes, proxy wars have been fought but a good percentage of the reason why none of us have ever had to worry about a draft is due to the fact we [the 1st world nations] will never fight a conventional war against each other while the possibility of mutually assured destruction exists.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14