Author Topic: I'll be able to play Ferrium right? (hardware question)  (Read 3214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: I'll be able to play Ferrium right? (hardware
Wait will there be any graphic upgrades for SCP? I mean wasn't that the point of Ferrium?

Well there are graphic upgrades but it's worth noting that with anything, SCP or hypothetical brand new engine, yer main issue is going to be getting that high fidelity content there.  Particularly with higher poly models and higher res maps; IIRC the main purpose of Ferrium was not so much graphical as gameplay (although a big part would have been, I believe, a lot more modding flexibility in all forms), such as proper support for newtonian physics or intersystem travel.  This is, of course, going by my half remembered recollections.

 

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
Re: I'll be able to play Ferrium right? (hardware question)
yeah basically most of Ferrium's purpose was greater flexibility of gameplay - the main SCP seems to be knocking down the barriers to this better than I expected so Ferrium was redundant anyway.

PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
Re: I'll be able to play Ferrium right? (hardware
So I guess however you look at it, Baranec wins.

  

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
Re: I'll be able to play Ferrium right? (hardware question)
no, the SCP wins
PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir