Author Topic: Girls vs Boys  (Read 1886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wild Fragaria

  • Geek girl
  • 23
Nature News

Published online: 15 October 2006; | doi:10.1038/news061009-14

Gene mutation turns girls into boys

The battle of the sexes continues to rage — right down to the level of our genes.

A gene has now been discovered that, when mutated, turns girls into boys. The finding advances, but also complicates, our understanding of how sex is determined by our genes.

In people, almost all men carry two different sex chromosomes (XY) and women are XX. But there are some (extremely rare) exceptions to this rule. It is possible to have XX men, for example.

This female-to-male sex reversal almost always happens when a certain gene called SRY, usually carried on the Y chromosome, accidentally ends up on the X chromosome inherited from the father.

Other genes have been found to muddle up sexual identity, making the resulting child neither fully male nor fully female. But in most cases of anatomically complete XX men — who have functional testes, but without a Y are infertile — SRY is involved. For this reason, it has long been called the gene that defines 'maleness'.

But now Giovanna Camerino of the University of Pavia in Italy and colleagues have found another gene that is equally important to the process.

The team studied a family in which four brothers were each XX. None carried the 'male' SRY gene. Instead, the team reports in Nature Genetics, they each have a mutation in a gene called RSPO1.

It seems that sex is determined in humans by a cascade of genes. At a crucial junction in this process lies a gene called SOX9, which in males is switched on by SRY, causing testis development. In females, the researchers now suggest, SOX9 might be typically switched off by RSPO1, which, via other genes in the cascade, leads to the development of ovaries. In the brothers, it seems the mutated RSPO1 gene could not fulfil its switching-off role, leaving SOX9 on and leading to male development.

This theory fits with animal studies: mice with two X chromosomes that have their SOX9 expression turned back on form testes.

The idea stands in contrast to previous theories that said that female development was basically the default that happens in the absence of genes to direct maleness. "What is really important is that suppression of male and induction of female development is an active process," says Andreas Schedl of INSERM, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research in Nice, who is a co-author on the paper. "RSPO1 clearly plays a key role in this process." The identification of this gene, he says, may be as important to the field as the identification of SRY.

RSPO1 encodes for a protein that is something of a multi-tasker — as well as being a key player in the sex-determining pathway, it also causes all the males in this family to suffer from a skin-thickening condition, and predisposes them to skin cancer. Understanding how it does this might help researchers to confirm its exact role in sex determination.

The next step, say the researchers, is to find out what happens when the RSOP1 gene is knocked out of mice.

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
We finally learn why men wear Sox in bed ;)

Seriously though, interesting stuff, but I foresee it going towards the whole 'Choose the sex of your child!' type practices before anything else :/

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Finally
lol wtf

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Interesting....I suspect that there's probably a reason why there's a bunch of different switches required to go either way and thats to prevent any one method of being blocked so as to not have all male or all female babies in a given population.  Just thinking off the top of my head here...nature has a very robust system in place.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
So... men with XX chromosomes in Italy, eh?

* Taristin wonders the.... further... ramifications of this.
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
"The ultimate woman is a man. Nature’s cruel, huh?" -- House

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
"The ultimate woman is a man. Nature’s cruel, huh?" -- House
Gotta love House!
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
Only when 100% estrogen is involved.

But yeah, pretty much.

 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
So... men with XX chromosomes in Italy, eh?

* Taristin wonders the.... further... ramifications of this.

That may explain Italians fiery tempers  :lol:
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline Freespace Freak

  • 28
  • Official forum permanewb
So... men with XX chromosomes in Italy, eh?

* Taristin wonders the.... further... ramifications of this.

I don't know but I think this might provide further insights.   :nervous:

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...

 

Offline Wild Fragaria

  • Geek girl
  • 23
The proposal of RSPO1-SOX9 is very interesting.  I wonder if RSPO1 is the main switch, will the RSPO1 K/O mice go back to being female once the RSPO1 gene is 're-introduced'.  Of course timing of the introduction is very important, in my opinion.

 

Offline Ashrak

  • Not Banned
  • 210
    • Imagination Designs
The proposal of RSPO1-SOX9 is very interesting.  I wonder if RSPO1 is the main switch, will the RSPO1 K/O mice go back to being female once the RSPO1 gene is 're-introduced'.  Of course timing of the introduction is very important, in my opinion.



 :confused: :confused: :confused:


come again? in english this time please
I hate My signature!

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
It helps if you read the first god damn post.

  

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
The proposal of RSPO1-SOX9 is very interesting.  I wonder if RSPO1 is the main switch, will the RSPO1 K/O mice go back to being female once the RSPO1 gene is 're-introduced'.  Of course timing of the introduction is very important, in my opinion.

I think it would be more about timing as you say, I suspect there comes a point where that 'switch' locks into place and becomes irreversible.