This is a pretty biased and unscientific test. The questions are poorly worded and often vague, and understandably confusing.
If globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
The first question is a great example of what is wrong with this test. First off, not everybody has the same definition of "Globalization" (and yes, the test spelled it wrong.) Second, who exactly is doing the "serving?" And are the two mutually exclusive?
There are lots of better ways to do a political attitude analysis. A better system would clearly define the issue, then present different arguments about it that correspond to different political ideals. Or, as an alternative, would have different "case scenarios" saying that if X were the current issue to be resolved, do you most agree with solution A, B, C, D, or E?
Anyway, my point is, this test is a piece of junk, and doesn't reflect political alignment with any degree of accuracy.
[This message has been edited by Anduril (edited 12-28-2001).]
