Author Topic: creationist astronomy  (Read 2015 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: creationist astronomy
As Phil Plait said, all I could hear was bla bla bla evolution bad bla.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2009, 10:28:01 am by The E »
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Galemp

  • Actual father of Samus
  • 212
  • Ask me about GORT!
    • Steam
    • User page on the FreeSpace Wiki
Re: creationist astronomy
WTF? Evolution is not astronomy.
"Anyone can do any amount of work, provided it isn't the work he's supposed to be doing at that moment." -- Robert Benchley

Members I've personally met: RedStreblo, Goober5000, Sandwich, Splinter, Su-tehp, Hippo, CP5670, Terran Emperor, Karajorma, Dekker, McCall, Admiral Wolf, mxlm, RedSniper, Stealth, Black Wolf...

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: creationist astronomy
:wtf:

Since when did Astrophysics and Evolution become interchangeable terms?

@Galemp - Exactly...

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: creationist astronomy
Astronomy = Science
Evolution = Science

So Astronomy and Evolution must both be connected! And since Evolution is wrong, Astronomy has to be as well!

Note: This does not represent my actual opinion.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: creationist astronomy
Difference is, Science enjoy the challenge of the unexplainable, whereas these people seem to be terrified of it, it's like reverting back to the days where Thunder was blamed on Thor because no-one was sure what really caused it, so it was easier to blame a big beard in the sky.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: creationist astronomy
Dumbest thing I've seen in ages.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Spicious

  • Master Chief John-158
  • 210
Re: creationist astronomy
Sounds like someone got paid on a per evolution(ist/ary) basis.

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: creationist astronomy
Quote from: Phil Plait, Bad Astronomy Blog
The nonsense pouring forth from those videos would carve the Grand Canyon in just days. It would be interesting to debunk the garbage presented point by point– in the sense that it would be interesting to slowly push a red-hot knitting needle into my ear — but there’s no need. Debunking that video is like trying to cure chicken pox one scab at a time. It’s all "god of the gaps" nonsense, "science can’t explain this or that", with them always and forever forgetting the one word that changes everything:

"Yet".
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: creationist astronomy
I seem to recall theories that Jupiter used to be far more massive than it is even now, but shed a great deal of it somehow, creating the 'ice skater' effect? That's sort of how Pulsars get started, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was something along those lines...

In fact, it does make one stop to wonder what a Pulsar would look like after several Billion years, as it loses momentum and heat, it would become a large, slightly warm body which rotates rapidly and is a heavy source of X-Rays, it would have thrown heavier elements out early in its life, and therefore consist mostly of light elements such as Hydrogen, Helium etc...
« Last Edit: May 23, 2009, 11:16:10 am by Flipside »

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: creationist astronomy
I'd laugh, but I can't. Too worried about how many nuts like that are on the loose.

 
Re: creationist astronomy
I bet these guys voted for bush.

and Hilary.
Fun while it lasted.

Then bitter.

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: creationist astronomy
Pick something to argue about and stick with it, don't bring politics into a religion argument, and (usually) vice versa.

That said, those guys are a few pieces short of a full puzzle.

  

Offline StarSlayer

  • 211
  • Men Kaeshi Do
    • Steam
Re: creationist astronomy
Astronomy is math, you can't fight math win.
“Think lightly of yourself and deeply of the world”