The problem with this is that it presents leadership as a skill to be honed; it is not, or we would have a much greater proportion of successful leaders because it would be truly teachable. We can teach you how to work the system to greater or lesser degrees, how to manipulate existing implements correctly. But that's not leadership. That's knowing how to play the game. It is a skill to be acquired.
Leadership is temperamental, not a skill. It manifests by going into the unknown and bringing order from chaos, in overthrowing the normal routine and bringing revolution and change. In theory anyone may be forced to these things and thereby be a leader, but it goes against the grain for most.
We can teach you to work the system, and there are levels of "leadership" where that's the only valid skill. But we can't make your personality change.