Author Topic: WTF California?  (Read 3168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stinkyFeet

  • 2-∞ - User does not compute
Putting a defendant who may not know much about the law in a position where he's working against his lawyer seems like it would work against the pursuit of the truth in my opinion. Imagine if he kept information secret from his lawyer because he wanted to keep his lawyer, but with his lack of knowledge about the law, mistakenly hid information that would of helped him?

 

Offline 666maslo666

  • 28
  • Artificial Neural Network

This is why I was saying that the better argument by the prosecution to deal with the appeal would have been an attempt to get the deception law tossed out entirely and simply go with rape due to inability to consent.

But this was rape by deception, not inability to consent. She wasnt asleep, the argument is that was dark and she was decieved.
"For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return." - Leonardo da Vinci

Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win you are still retarded.

  

Offline MP-Ryan

  • Makes General Discussion Make Sense.
  • Global Moderator
  • 210
  • Keyboard > Pen > Sword

This is why I was saying that the better argument by the prosecution to deal with the appeal would have been an attempt to get the deception law tossed out entirely and simply go with rape due to inability to consent.

But this was rape by deception, not inability to consent. She wasnt asleep, the argument is that was dark and she was decieved.

According to the news report, the sexual assault began while she was still asleep and continued after she woke.
"In the beginning, the Universe was created.  This made a lot of people very angry and has widely been regarded as a bad move."  [Douglas Adams]