The scientific procedure for forming conclusions on bizarre astronomical data:
Try to think of all possible scenarios that might explain what is happening, and model them. Check if the models produce predictions that are consistent (nor not!) with the observations. Make more observations to test those models further. See if you can isolate a single working hypothesis.
The whack-job procedure for forming conclusions on bizarre astronomical data:
"I can't explain it, therefore it's aliens!"
How good popular science reporting makes a headline:
"Have We Detected Megastructures Built By Aliens Around A Distant Star?
Popular Science - 1 day ago"
How whack-job popular science reporting makes a headline:
Alien 'MEGASTRUCTURE' found as bizarre star is blocked by huge object | Daily Mail Online
Daily Mail - 1 day ago
Whatever is going on around that star, it's pretty damn interesting, whether involving natural astrophysics or otherwise. Myself and I think most of my mates are of the view that "comets and a lot of cool, optically thick dust" is the most likely among the working hypotheses. But damn would it be mindblowing if it's really a Dyson sphere (or ringworld).
