I wouldn't be so relieved. I mean, he doesn't really make much of a secret of the fact that he doesn't make many of the decisions or anything himself... MAYBE choosing Iraq, but it's almost TOO obvious that that would be Little Bush's style. AND it was on the list anyway. Truth is, a bunch of people much more competent, and much less interested in the common man's well-being, is in charge. No shady government conspiracies, no NWO, no Jewish/Freemason/Rockefeller plot, just those good old boys, the heads of major corporations. Mostly oil, yeah, but I think it's a bit silly to assume just that.
I mean, really. Nobody's hiding ANYTHING about it. Many of Bush's bills have been clearly written by and for the richer parts of major industries. But even if Little Bush came out and MADE A FRIGGIN' SPEECH about it, people'd still go on inagining HE was the one in charge. People are stupid. And part of being stupid, apparently, is that they'l ***** endlessly about what officials say, but go along with whatever the government does, like cows to the slaughter. WORDS. And that's all that matters these days- have the right rhetoric, the freshest buzzwords- "terrorist!", and you could take over the world. More than that, you could take over the world and grind up all the people to make pastries, so long as you phrased it correctly. Mainstream "liberals" fret over what we can and can't call arabs and blacks, while the cops arrest them on no charges at all and shoot them like dogs for sport. "Conservatives" blather about "bipartisanship", meaning "me first". **** 'em all- they deserve the world they make. As for the rest of us, the only hope we have is the certianity that he will succeed in making himself a tin-pot dictator, and then we pothead anarchist free-love dirty hippies can come out to play again. And this time, it'll be for keeps.
Think the Pentagon'll make a good Ecstasy lab?
