Author Topic: Javadoc  (Read 2410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
Is it my imagination or did I read somewhere that the SCP is meant to be using Javadoc?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2002, 03:26:51 pm by 848 »

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Quote
Originally posted by RandomTiger
Is it my imagination or is the SCP meant to be using Javadoc?


As in ...oh...er.. bugger forget the syntax.  But I think i know what you mean - the sort of specially market comments that javadoc uses to create the html file with?  Preceeded by an @ sysmbol IIRC... nevr used it myself of course.....

(I checked my HD for an example, only to find a out of date - read broken - route graph program and a prolog parser...ho hum)

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
How do you get javadoc to work on a cpp file?

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Quote
Originally posted by RandomTiger
How do you get javadoc to work on a cpp file?


Bugger knows.  I should have said I used Java for that stuff (and only actually used javadoc once...).  but I wonder if the standard java compiler could sort of shuffle out the documentation without having to actually compile the file.  Of course, it could be cross platform now - jdoc makes a hell of a lot of sense, so I wouldn;t be surprised if C++ used it.  Or even if c++ came up with the idea in the first place......

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
Hopefully Inquisitor will turn up and sort this out for me.

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211

 

Offline Inquisitor

Javadoc style comments, for use with Doxygen, which I intend to run on 3.3 when we get it tagged and released ;)

I think we have been largely ignoring it, but some Doxygen output is better than none.
No signature.

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
Anyway I can run it locally to see the output?

 

Offline Inquisitor

No signature.