[Kazan]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&ncid=716&e=1&u=/ap/20040405/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_fallujah

[aldo_14]

Also Baghdad and Basra; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3601887.stm

There's a Shia uprising.... whereas before it had been the Sunni muslims, who were the main supporters of Saddam.

[Lonestar]

Yes the **** is hitting the fan. Iraqi's are making a statement, they no want US help.

I think they should say it in English, maybe the americans will listen then.

[an0n]

They're using the universal language of high-power explosions to get the message across quite effectively.

[Flipside]

Well, as complex as this is, it should also be borne in mind that any other invading country in their history, including England, Germany, China and Russia would have bombed this village. Flat.

That doesn't make this right, just suggest we all keep this in mind.

[Bobboau]

fuck

[Bobboau]

you know looking at the chain of events over the last few days I realy wonder if **** was TRYING to incite a violent upriseing

[an0n]

Probably.

[Kazan]

is it still bleeping ****?

[edit]
yes it's still bleeping B-U-S-H -- why is it bleeping the unpresident's name?

[an0n]

Something to do with Shrike and his communist rebellion.

[kasperl]

so **** get's censored, but **** doesn't?

edit: nm, bob did it like this: ****

anyway, this is only a logical follow up.

[Lonestar]

****es name is vulgar, whoever bleeped it im glad they did. If he found we were posting this as much as we were HLP may be considered terrorists instead of debatists.

As far as the the city being bombed in the past, and them being lucky today? What kind of statement is that? A threat? Fact? Hard to swallow that one without looking at it badly.

Fact is Iraq wants the US out of the country, the US is pissed they had casualties and use it as an excuse to pacify a bunch of people who are better of killing each other IMO.

Seriously, what is the US interest there? This morning the administration could hardly give a reason why, or even hard facts relating to the arrest of the 25 men who apparently killed four american contractors.

No burden of proof is required in iraq, they can just kill whoever they think is involved and get away with it. iraq kills 4 US people, they take 25? Hows that fair? And without burden of proof to top it off?

The US is being hypocritical in their policy, and obviously only trying to create war and problems in iraq so they dont have to hand it over on june 30th.

Ill bet 100 American dollars right here the US does NOT hand over power on the 30th because of the iraqi populous problem.
Im betting Iraq will never really be free, and while the rest of the world is getting more intense in their problems, US focuses on their oil problem in Iraq.

I honestly hope the US gets the message eventually, it seems to me the US has a non-respecting foreign policy, a policy that says "kill 'em all and let god sort them out"

Why do the US have to stick their big nose in their in the first place? Still no damn WMD's......mumble....mumble....NWO

[StratComm]

It was done almost certainly to diffuse political polarization that has gripped these forums for about a month.  In theory, if you can't use **** in a sentence you won't talk about him as much.  But that hasn't worked.

[Kazan]

if they're trying to dispell our politics talk they can [connery]"shuck my wang"[/connery]

[Su-tehp]

Originally posted by Lonestar
****es name is vulgar, whoever bleeped it im glad they did. If he found we were posting this as much as we were HLP may be considered terrorists instead of debatists.

At least you're in Canada, Lone, so you're safe from prosecution...unless you get extradited. Those of us here inside the US aren't nearly as safe.

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by Su-tehp


At least you're in Canada, Lone, so you're safe from prosecution...unless you get extradited. Those of us here inside the US aren't nearly as safe.

They will never take me alive. It will be a cold day in hell when i let the US extradite me from my Country up north.
YOU CANT CATCH ME COPPERS! Besides i have the right to freedom of speach i think.......

****es term is almost over then the new NWO leader will appear, Mr Kerry who i beleive will be more militaristic then **** was, but time will tell.

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Kazan
if they're trying to dispell our politics talk they can [connery]"shuck my wang"[/connery]

   Ack!  No!  Use 'dick', not 'wang' - he probably doesn;t know the meaning of the word.  And go for 'Pushy Galore' references - works a treat

My god, that was Ot.  and ridiculously picky..... meh

[an0n]

What the ****?!?

All the Shia guy did was kill someone who was, by anyone but America and the UK's standards, a traitor, back in May which was effectively war-time.

So he killed a traitor. During war time.

How is that any reason to issue a warrant for his arrest?

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by an0n
What the ****?!?

All the Shia guy did was kill someone who was, by anyone but America and the UK's standards, a traitor, back in May which was effectively war-time.

So he killed a traitor. During war time.

How is that any reason to issue a warrant for his arrest?

Cause the US said so, and they say some Iraqi judge said so. And they wont name the judge so we will never know.

This is how the US politics work, they jerk you around until your too tired to look for the answers anymore. All this propaganda we get in the west, is just that, propaganda. Big news conference today was only to make threats and make US look good during their pacification of Fallujah. I dont like seeing people fight or die, but in this case i hope Fallujah prevails. its time to kick the bully our of their backyard.

[an0n]

Ahahahaha.

I just thought:

This explains why they veto'd the condemnation against Israel.