Originally posted by Tiara
Well, I guess it's a matter of taste wether you like the show or not, but saying that the characters were bad is simply untrue.
Sisko - While not the best character in Trek, he is more realistic then about 99% of all other characters. He shows actual Human traits like anger, grief, love and much more. he is without a doubt one of the most realistic Humans (
) on the show.
Worf - well, whats to say. He and Martok are the only klingons i like
Garak - Simply *THE BEST* character ever to appear in any trek show ever.
Quark - The first decently played Ferengi.
Odo - Well, whats to say. his character development was pretty much very good. Not to mention his personal story arc.
Dax - Pretty well portrait character if you ask me. The whole 7 lifetimes was well done. though she was still one of the least liked characters IMHO.
Weyoun - C'mon! The guy did a perfect job here. All kinds of different Weyouns and perfectly played with slight differences in character.
Also, plot holes? What plot holes?
---
I ment MAIN charachters...
Of course Quark and Garak are interesting!
And Worf? I like his charachter, but he is a TNG tag-a-long. They took his char from TNG and put him trough the same orderals as before (loosing a women he loves, loosing and regaining honour...). I just call that bad writing to re-use the charachter tht way..
Sisko...hem..He was showing a bit too much anger and was acting too wild to make a belivable captain. Starfleet Command would never tolerate behaviour like that.. I mean, he poisioned the whole planet full of women and children for Christs' sake!
Dax, Odo - not bad, alltough I hated the idea of shpachangers and simbionts in teh stomach. they don't make much sense.
--
Don't get me wrong, DS9 had some good charachters, but there were too few of them, and the plot holes were terrible and there were too many to count....
I can name a few if you realyl insist, but even if you somehow manage to disprove them all (and you won't), that's just the tip of the iceberg...
