[Taristin]

Or just a giant shield, like a contact lense in shaoe, to guard the fighterbay...?

[WeatherOp]

Would putting fighter models in the fighter bay be going overboard?

[Nuclear1]

[chant] Do it! Do it![/chant]

Sounds like a good idea, and it adds some good depth to it.

[Taristin]

If it's LODed correctly, with the new code, then no.......... not necessarily.

[Pnakotus]

Originally posted by ngtm1r
Table entry for the Hapshepsut includes at least four fusion mortars...

Really?  Shows how much *I* know!

I'm not getting how rotating links to shield generation.  Then again, aren't rotate-y things in FS usually sensors, jammers, etc?

[Taristin]

Or reactors...
 think about that...

[Trivial Psychic]

The cyllinder could be an externally mounted subspace drive motivator.  Most ships have their's inside, but the hull design didn't include of space for the proper cooling equipment, so it is externally mounted to compensate for this.  Also, having it external, leaves more space for fighter compliments and fleet co ordination systems to support its fleet command carrier role.

[karajorma]

Originally posted by WeatherOp
Would putting fighter models in the fighter bay be going overboard?

Yes. Put dock points instead and then we can multi-dock whatever the hell we like there. If you model in fighters they can never launch and never change.

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Boomer
That.... object reminds me of, among other things, something aldo did....

Eeep.  Burn it! Burn it!

[WeatherOp]

Originally posted by Trivial Psychic
The cyllinder could be an externally mounted subspace drive motivator.  Most ships have their's inside, but the hull design didn't include of space for the proper cooling equipment, so it is externally mounted to compensate for this.  Also, having it external, leaves more space for fighter compliments and fleet co ordination systems to support its fleet command carrier role.

I like that idea.

Originally posted by karajorma

If you model in fighters they can never launch and never change.

I will only put in a few fighters, and it will have lots of dock points also, just it would look nice with some damaged fighters in there as well.

By the way, how many dock points are suported?

[Taristin]

How many you got?

[WeatherOp]

None just yet, cause I'm trying to think of what a Vasudan docking point would look like.

But, it would be nice to have over 20.

[BlackDove]

The docking point would look like the main hall while you're aboard the Psamtik.

[WeatherOp]

Can anyone get a screenshot? I don't want to play thru the entire campaign right now.

[aldo_14]

Um, no.  At least, not via google imagesearch.

[FireCrack]

In the vasudan main hall ships rest in "trays" it seems, though that could be just a transport mechanism.

[pyro-manic]

Weatherop: vhall.pcx in sparky_fs2.vp

[WeatherOp]

Originally posted by pyro-manic
Weatherop: vhall.pcx in sparky_fs2.vp

Thanks

Here is the first hangar pics.

[WeatherOp]

Sanity and Moddeling is about the same, because you can lose control of both of them.

[Sheepy]

Im loving the model, but i have to say the hanger looks mighty terran, especially with the square entrance, needs vasudanising, with all the swirling curvy lines of niceness.