[jdjtcagle]

IIRC, Laws of physics doesn't explain the force that holds the Protons and Neutrons together...

[diamondgeezer]

Ah, yes, you're quite right. I should have said "because of quantum"

[Knight Templar]

leap?

[Flipside]

And it all boils down to Fractals, which is handy if you're in the T-Shirt business

[demon442]

Originally posted by ShadowDrakken
I'm a how, I know how things work, and my constant quest in life is to know the why... without the why, I am lost an unable to function. If someone doesn't tell me why something is, the how is useless and/or pointless.

My feelings exactly.

[Liberator]

My point is that people are predisposed to knowing either the How or the Why and have to work much harder to learn the other than someone who is predisposed to it.

[Gortef]

Banana!

No I think it's both for me too

[Kazan]

you could drown an ant in the depth of that lake


*rolleyes*


your conclusions are all wrong - I am living contradiction.  I know both HOW and WHY

[diamondgeezer]

Explain

[01010]

All bow to master Kazan, please, show us the errors of our ways oh magnificent one.

[Liberator]

Kaz, unless you're some kind of droid(and I still haven't made up my mind), you are predisposed toward one or the other.  It takes years to equalize between the two and you always learn one before the other.

[Kazan]

Liberator: provide reference materials proving that you must be predisposed tword being one or the other or don't try to assert that.


I am predisposed tword neither.

[jdjtcagle]

Kazan is a Vulcan

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Kazan
Liberator: provide reference materials proving that you must be predisposed tword being one or the other or don't try to assert that.


I am predisposed tword neither.

You could start an argument in an empty house, couldn;t you Kaz?

[Kazan]

aldo_14: no i couldn't, because in an empty house nobody is there to make assertions without backing

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Kazan
aldo_14: no i couldn't, because in an empty house nobody is there to make assertions without backing

See - you're doing it again.  you'd probably have a go at the mold for being incorrect in its simple existentialist worldview, or something.

now, try not to argue your way out of that one.

[Kazan]

I do not argue with things that are not sentient

[01010]

Bet you'd love to try it though.

[jdjtcagle]

Originally posted by Kazan
I do not argue with things that are not sentient

Yet, you call them names...  I didn't expect that from you, it doesn't fit the character you claim to be

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Kazan
I do not argue with things that are not sentient

you argue with Lib.