I must admit I enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself. Further, you're reaching the height of hilarity saying you don't have an axe to grind when you didn't say a damn word about Flaser, or for that matter Dekker, but just "randomly" said something about me. Now, retroactively, you're scrambling to cover your ass on that front, which shows clearly in your fractured logic. Come now, do you really think I will believe you then?
Indeed, why should anyone believe a word you say? You've proved to be singularly unreliable. You've sat on your ass for every project you're involved in for months. I should know, since I am after all actually working on the same projects.
You complain about my opinons, but you don't even have an opinion most of the time, just a snarky comment of questionable intelligence. When you do bother to express opinions, as now, they reach incredible heights of absurdity. It's amazing anyone ever believed you were inteliigent, really it is. Here you're ranting on about masturbation tools, which is highly amusing for several reasons. I spent about one line describing the subject in questions' physical attributes and the rest of the post on other topics. Clearly that's not the way I see the subject. Otherwise I would have been on about how hot she was. If you actually had a clue what you were talking about, you would have realized that as physical attractiveness goes I shorted myself with my choice. However, the most damning issue with your logic is simply that you completely ignore the nonvisual aspects of a character. That's what character means, for God's sake, the way one acts, not the way one looks.
So, either I must conclude you're willfully ignoring the gaps in your logic in a desperate attempt to cover your ass, or you've never read a book, watched TV, or played any kind of video game, you have no idea what the word character actually means, and your contact with fictional people has been limited solely to one-off still images.
Option 2 sounds a bit unlikely, doesn't it now?
