That's because most of this board doesn't believe in lazily sectarian blame games played for the purposes of demonizing a group of people and instead likes to look at the cold, hard realities of immigration-caused schisms, class division & inequality of both treatment and opportunity, and racism. It's easy to go 'Muslim savages', because we can abdicate any responsibility we feel for holding onto supersticious prejudices about people of a different culture or skin colour.
Kind of like how anarchist riots at G8 conferences are seen as disconnected from Christianity (y'know, because they're mostly by white europeans and north americans, so they must be all Christians - right?).
How about the "cold, hard realities" that the majority of the rioters were Muslims? Not saying that radical Islam had anything to do with it, or that it's some terrorist plot to take over France, but it's worth noting.
I'm guessing the majority were also young, immigrant / immigrant-descended, living in council estates, unemployed with low income... etc. I'd like to add I love the phrase
Though a majority of the youths committing the acts are Muslim, and of African or North African origin, the mayhem has yet to take on any ideological or religious overtones
Why don't we see
that little bit of phrasology when
riots are by mainly Christian whites?
But, as I said, it's piss easy to blame religion for riots. Because religion is the one cause you can cite and then do precisely **** all about to remove and still be safe.
Some of the poorest, most socially excluded and deprived people in France were African-Immigrant Muslims, and they rioted. Why pick 'muslim' from that list of characteristics? Why not
black? Why not immigrant, or poor, or unemployed? Oh, right.... it's not good TV or media.