Author Topic: Could this be done with shielding?  (Read 3612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
Re: Could this be done with shielding?
that's in the subobject properties. $name=OMGSOOPARGUNOFDOOM
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 
Re: Could this be done with shielding?
Ok I think I either have a problem with my model or theres a bug in FS.


Message indicates it's targetting tachyon turret while the hud shows Laser Turret
That's cool and ....disturbing at the same time o_o  - Vasudan Admiral

"Don't play games with me. You just killed someone I like, that is not a safe place to stand. I'm the Doctor. And you're in the biggest library in the universe. Look me up."

"Quick everyone out of the universe now!"

 

Offline Wanderer

  • Wiki Warrior
  • 211
  • Mostly harmless
Re: Could this be done with shielding?
Yeah.. i have noticed that problem too.. And I would really prefer that the turrets name (or rather property) could be defined in table file instead of model file.
Do not meddle in the affairs of coders for they are soggy and hard to light

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Re: Could this be done with shielding?
I think a whole bunch of stuff from the pofs should be set (or at least made possible to override) in the table files. The FOV and mass values particularly come to mind.

 

Offline asyikarea51

  • 210
  • -__-||
Re: Could this be done with shielding?
mass values

That's one I'd really like to see adjustable... Different POFs from different makers have wildly varying masses and it's a pain having to go through each and every POF and recompiling the VPs every few minutes during testing... :shaking: