*cringe*
I hate naming ships after the most famous namesakes. The GSC Einstein, for example. The Lucifer was fine because it was the most prominent and deadly ship. Ilúvatar, being the creator god and all, seems a bit over-the-top to me. I also didn't like seeing the Cthulhu actually appearing in Derelict. Would you actually ever name a ship the HMS God? Or how about the USS Buddha?
Haha..

Meh, Ilúvatar is a fictional deity. And while we have Zeus (a supreme god of Greek pantheon, though not necessarily creator of world), Athena and Artemis as bombers, I don't think throwing
fictional deities into the mix can make it any worse (if you consider it a bad thing in the first place). Not to mention Hindu deities. Who would actually use the name "Shivans"... oh wait.

And we have a Titan (namely Cyclops) as a missile, as well as god of Sun (Helios) in the same role.. and the bringer of fire to humanity (Prometheus) whose liver is every day eaten by an eagle and regenerates at night as a primary weapon.
It's true however that most famous namesakes can get a little boring after a while. Perhaps I wouldn't use Eru Ilúvatar's name as a ship name, but choose some of the lesser Valar - there's enough of them to spare.
...Did Cthulhu himself actually appear in the Derelict as a name of a ship? I don't remember... Seems I have to re-play it.
