Author Topic: Something wrong with the second law of motion  (Read 8341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Something wrong with the second law of motion
As has been stated repeatedly, the correctional thrusters don't make sense.

If you're trying to intercept a flight of bombers attacking a medical frigate (as cited earlier), you'd disable the correctional thrusters so you could get more speed.

But you can't do that.


 

Offline MikeRoz

  • 26
Re: Something wrong with the third law of motion
IWar2 BTW is one of the most boring games ever developed (as far as I'm concerned anyway) I can't think of any other game that boring.
BLASPHEMY!
Rave reviews of my previous posts:
"Wow.  Just wow.  Well, just about the whole post is devoid of reasonable technical merit and accuracy." -Enki
"Wow, he just wasted about an hour of his life." -MachManX
"There are 5 million things wrong with your post, of which many have already been pointed out..." -blackhole
"Grrr. Someone please monkey mike...He's causing more problems than he's solving" -terran_emperor
"You're not very bright, are you." - General Battuta

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Re: Something wrong with the second law of motion
I vote for inertial nullifiers
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key