communication is just come about recently because the organisms living on this planet have mutated or evolved to a point where communication is necessary, and give it another few million years and communication will probably not be necessary to figure what anyone is saying off-shoot or not because we might have evolved past such a stage.
I understand what you're saying but you're wrong. Communication has existed as long as multicellular animals have, possibly even before that. Insects communicate with pheromones. Canines mark their territory with scent marks and use
extensive body language and vocal communication. Pretty much all animals communicate with each other in some way or another.
The only reason why communication would ever disappear would be if there were nothing to communicate to, so unless you're suggesting a single conscious entity (not like hivemind mentality but truly just one being) for humanity, with no individuality... no, that won't really happen. And even then there would still need to be information exchange from individual biological brains to others, in other words communication; but if they formed one conscious entity, then it would be more like a networked cluster computation centre. I guess it depends on the definition of communication as well.
Anyway, I don't think loss of individuality will be very probable for humanity as a whole.
as for social structures in human hierarchy it goes:
Father - - Mother - Direct Control __________ <<
| \
_____/ \_____ |
/ Progeny \ |
\_____________/ - Under control until Control is Usurped.
The viscous Circle is complete. there is nothing more to understand...
Vicious is the adjective you're looking for. Viscosity is something else altogether...
And... err... the ASCII flowchart makes no sense.
