Author Topic: Flags in signatures, what about them? (Read 12510 times)

Mobius · **Reply #20 on:** January 18, 2009, 06:10:52 am

Restrictions for having signatures? Sounds a bit harsh but may work...I think limiting the length of signatures is the best option, anyway...

ShadowGorrath · **Reply #21 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:33:33 am

I just hope that my signature doesn't get cut. I mean- it has the entire purpose of being me listed there

Mobius · **Reply #22 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:38:58 am

The only issue about your signature is that you should, IMO, sort everything in 1-2 lines. Also, instead of writing colored text and adding a link near it, you should rather use a colored text that also serves as link.

Jeff Vader · **Reply #23 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:41:09 am

Agreed on limiting it vertically, but urling a piece of text overrides any and all colour settings.

Mobius · **Reply #24 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:46:57 am

I don't think so.

Shade · **Reply #25 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:48:33 am

I would also suggest dropping the glowy text and using coloured text instead, as glowy text makes the listing of the entire purpose for being you unreadable (and very annoying) to everyone who uses Firefox. Which I suspect is a fairly large percentage of this forum's regulars.

Mobius · **Reply #26 on:** January 18, 2009, 07:55:57 am

I know - mine was an example. My intent was to show that colors and glows can be mixed.

Also, Italics rule.

ShadowGorrath · **Reply #27 on:** January 18, 2009, 08:38:16 am

The reason they are so is cause there'd be multiple links

Mobius · **Reply #28 on:** January 18, 2009, 08:56:46 am

The colors in the Lithuanian flag should be sorted this way: Li-etu-va.

FreeSpaceFreak · **Reply #29 on:** January 18, 2009, 10:52:15 am

No, actually the yellow part is the biggest IIRC.

And

I think this thread has served its purpose, it's going just slightly off-topic now... I think...

ShadowGorrath · **Reply #30 on:** January 18, 2009, 10:54:53 am

Actually, those flag colours shouldn't go from left to right, but from top to bottom.

And all colours should be of the same size, but you can't givide 7 by 3.

FSF, get on MSN. And that's not a request.

Androgeos Exeunt · **Reply #31 on:** January 18, 2009, 11:54:17 am

An order, then.

karajorma · **Reply #32 on:** January 18, 2009, 01:58:05 pm

That should stop the stupidity.....eventually.

And you people wonder why you can't have avatars.

Shade · **Reply #33 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:07:23 pm

Ahh, much better. Finally my year-long crusade against that damn glow tag can come to an end

Snail · **Reply #34 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:13:56 pm

Quote from: karajorma on January 18, 2009, 01:58:05 pm

That should stop the stupidity.....eventually.

You killed the glow tag... Hillarious.

I especially like SG's new signature.

Mobius · **Reply #35 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:17:48 pm

But now it's insanely long...

Shade · **Reply #36 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:20:22 pm

For now. Even so, I prefer that to the previous look though. At least it doesn't make my eyes bleed. And if it getting worse for a little while is what it takes for it to get better, than I'm fine with that.

karajorma · **Reply #37 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:27:32 pm

Quote from: Mobius on January 18, 2009, 02:17:48 pm

But now it's insanely long...

Which means that anyone stupid enough to stick them in their sig now has no excuse when their sig gets purged later.

ShadowGorrath · **Reply #38 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:32:35 pm

Fine, removed my signature entirely. Happy now? Abusing your damn moderator/admin powers just cause you didn't like someone's signature? At least my signature wasn't annoying spam like that iamzack's posts and threads were. So at the first mention of my signature you edit it, while you let her spam everywhere just cause she was a woman? My signature was meant to show the most recent important events of the mods I am involved in.

Well, whatever, guess it's your kind of fun, huh? Thanks for acting like assholes.

Shade · **Reply #39 on:** January 18, 2009, 02:35:20 pm

Acting like assholes? You're the one who kept using a non-standard tag that was poison on the eyes of everyone not using IE, despite being informed of this. So half the forum has to suffer just for you to enjoy your IE-only glowiness? Much of your sig wasn't even readable to anyone not on IE, making it entirely pointless in the first place.

I strongly support the admins in having made this change, as that tag was insanely annoying and clearly people could not be trusted to not abuse it.

News:

Author Topic: Flags in signatures, what about them? (Read 12510 times)

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?

Re: Flags in signatures, what about them?