Well his father is a minister but I didn't see what type. Maybe he was really strict and wouldn't let the kid do anything at all fun his entire life. Nothing says he was allowed to snowboard either. Again still no excuse for killing someone.
What I don't understand, is why the Father wouldn't just let the kid play the game, I'm not sure about the American Rating system, but here in Aus it's restricted for sale to people 15 years or older, unless in the company and guidance of an adult, the kid was 16. So therefore, the child should've been allowed to be playing the game anyway, and the Minister was just over exercising his authority as a parent. And the website says,
"His father forbade the games, saying that were too violent and sexually explicit."
WTF! Sexually explicit? His dad-
In short, is a narrow minded-son-of-a-*****, had he been more open minded, And aware of the law allowing his son to legally purchase and play the videogame, and understanding the importance of that medium to his child's generation and maybe understanding the interests of his son, he wouldn't have this mother****ing mess.
IMO, the Minister is the immature one here, along with his son