Actually I really appreciate the constructive criticism, finally we're getting somewhere, now if only every critique was done in that fashion we'd be rolling.
So, let's discuss:
Here's your side-by-side comparison. I helpfully cut them both down so I'd have a known reference when scaling. Interestingly, they don't come out the same way; the plan view version is six pixels taller when scaled for length with yours.
Seems pretty much about right. With big thick outlines like that sometimes it's tough to get an exact scale, so for the most part I aimed for my edges to line up just short of the middle or inside the outline in some cases. Going by the outer black edge leaves a rather bubbly shape.
You've added intakes or something similar to the front of the small protrusions on the legs that are not there in the fighter-mode plan drawings. They are in the VF-1A B-mode pics, but are not the VT-1D/VF-1J version, and they are smaller because they are shaped differently in the VF-1A as compared to yours.
Conflicting references, I'm also looking at many other images, especially those on the box art of the Hasegawa model kits, which are incredibly well done if you ask me. I chose to scale them to the size seen in those paintings, where they are quite prominent. I'm still fiddling with their shape
The nose is definitely the wrong shape.
I disagree, as chief pointed out, it seems to match up quite well except for right at the base where the head will be. That's simply a matter of sanity, you can have either a flat bottomed nose (which doesn't seem to be the case) or an indentation that rises higher up. I chose the latter
The nose lasers are overenlongated, stretching further back then they should, and probably not as bulbous as they should be.
Well, first off, they're not lasers, (unless you're talking about a single bad case of commissioned animation by an outside company, which most macross fans choose to ignore)
But anyways, they're placeholders
You've added a lip to the cockpit, and change in its canting at the rear as well as making it shorter.
I've since removed the lip after looking at photos of real aircraft canopies
The tail extension has developed an interesting bulbous tip that's not present in the plan view.
They are indeed there, it's tough to see as the plan view is rather low res. Their shape is off, but they're merely placeholders for now.
The midship fins are both the same size when the tailwards one should be smaller, are oversized.
That's a matter of conflicting references, while that plan view has one smaller than the other, many other pictures have them equally scaled
The lower lip of the exhaust port is clearly enlongated past the upper in yours. The plan view shows them to be of equal length (though not equal angle).
Artistic and functional choice for when it transforms to Battroid mode, as well as once again a case of conflicting references. In battroid mode, the forward "toe" protrudes further forward than the rear. If both were the same length in fighter mode, but with the rear having a sharper angle, it would have to stretch further back than the forward.
Shall I go on?
Absolutely, this is the type of discussion that really should be present in all WIP threads.