The only obstacles to creating a working intersystem drive for fightercraft before FS1 were the limited available size and power output available in those types of ships.
Which is why it would require an extra trick or two in order to make it work, supporting that theory.
The Russians actually did that with their first class of nuclear submarines, which used a cut-down Pressurized Water Reactor-1 design. This turned out to be a bad decision in the end because the cut-down meant removing most of the radiation shielding, and a sterling example of why you should copy something you don't understand exactly.
My point exactly. It's entirely possible the GTA had some working prototypes that ended up malfunctioning, causing them to go back to the drawing board to figure out exactly what that last trick is.
Explain to me, in detail, how you typed up this post, how your computer interpreted it, and all the steps necessary for it to get to my screen.
Depends on how much detail you want, or should I spare you the explanation?
Every day, you will use at least a dozen devices whose workings you do not understand.
True, but then again I don't try to design them either.
On a larger scale, people can build devices whose workings they do not fully understand (were your electronics perhaps made in China or Taiwan?).
Depending on the type of device they were often given pre fabricated circuit boards, soldering training, the parts, as well as instructions on where to put them.
Something we have absolutely no reason to assume.
And there's no reason to assume otherwise, based on what we have seen. Subspace is something that works totally different from what we have now.
, and the GTA would have been in business
Yeah, just like that Russian sub.
If the Vasudans really had figured out a way to solve the miniaturization and power issues before now, it would have been a simple matter of pulling some plug-and-play on a few captured jump drives,
I understand your point, but if it used a subspace effect or principle they weren't aware of to go around the power issue then wouldn't replicating it be that much more difficult?
The mechanics of performing a subspace jump, whether intrasystem or intersystem, are exactly the same for a Hercules as they are for an Orion.
The general idea is, but the limitations of power on the Hercules makes it so that in order to make intersystem jumps another method must be found. In real life there is actually an example of this, the warp drive. 10 years ago it was physically impossible until a team of physicists from Baylor university found a way to make it happen (theoretically), even though it does the same thing it uses newer ideas in physics (such as dark energy and string theory). It still requires something like 10^45 joules to make it work, but according to they will keep working on it to greatly reduce the power requirements to a more managable level. Now, if you weren't aware of dark energy or didn't know much about it, then that kind of miniaturization is quite difficult.
I can cite god knows how many instances of China stealing the design of whole weapons systems or weapons platforms in the last fourteen years, most of them Russian.
I think we can safely assume both the PVN and GTA had better security than the Russians (post Soviet Russians anyway). I also imagine given the much wider gulf between the two species that spying would be reduced somewhat as well, that being said I fully admit that on occation major piracy will happen. Actually we can use that to explain what took the GTA so long to make the Valkyrie, they needed to steal better engines.
EDIT: Also we should consider that the US and China are not at war, and actively trade with eachother. Wouldn't that make spying much easier?