Author Topic: Does this make any sense?  (Read 5345 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Does this make any sense?
Yes, and February 1st was the last day of January.
That might have made some sense if months had a 0th day.
They don't, but his point still remains.  The fact that we officially ignore natural numerical separations in favor of some arbitrary declaration of "no year 0" will never make any sense to me.  As Solatar pointed out, the phrase "the 70s" naturally implies "years with a 7 in the tens position," not "years with a 7 in the tens position, except for 1970, because it's too old, but also including 1980, for some ill-defined reason."  The entire human calendar system is just an arbitrary grouping of regular planetary movements.  Ten consecutive years will always be a decade, no matter where you start counting...so why not start where the count looks nicer?

Seriously, let's be done with this nonsense and just declare that there was a Year 0.  Or if you can't swallow that, just declare that the first century A.D. consisted of only 99 years, or included 1 B.C. as well.  That way, the centuries and millennia end when they naturally should, when the year count "rolls over" to a brand-new set of numbers.  Saying that 2000 was part of the 1900s is fundamentally counter-intuitive and messy.

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Does this make any sense?
Mongoose:  Exactly. :)

"The 70's" is considered to range from 1970 to 1979 (inclusive).  Not 1971 to 1980.  Stating otherwise because of how "decades" is defined is like doing the same thing for months, hence the February 1st statement.

Quote
"Seriously, let's be done with this nonsense and just declare that there was a Year 0."
Let's make 2012 the new year zero.  :D
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Spicious

  • Master Chief John-158
  • 210
Re: Does this make any sense?
They don't, but his point still remains.  The fact that we officially ignore natural numerical separations in favor of some arbitrary declaration of "no year 0" will never make any sense to me.  As Solatar pointed out, the phrase "the 70s" naturally implies "years with a 7 in the tens position," not "years with a 7 in the tens position, except for 1970, because it's too old, but also including 1980, for some ill-defined reason."
This argument fails to hold up in light of the counter-example that the xth century refers to the period of time from (x-1) hundred and one to (x) hundred while the x00s refers to the period of time from x hundred to x hundred and ninety nine thus demonstrating the disconnect between the xth something and the "x0s". Your need to make the two ideas line up ends up with the first year being an infinite sequence of ones as it would dictate that the first decade line up with the 10s, first century with the 100s and so on.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Does this make any sense?
They don't, but his point still remains.  The fact that we officially ignore natural numerical separations in favor of some arbitrary declaration of "no year 0" will never make any sense to me.  As Solatar pointed out, the phrase "the 70s" naturally implies "years with a 7 in the tens position," not "years with a 7 in the tens position, except for 1970, because it's too old, but also including 1980, for some ill-defined reason."
This argument fails to hold up in light of the counter-example that the xth century refers to the period of time from (x-1) hundred and one to (x) hundred while the x00s refers to the period of time from x hundred to x hundred and ninety nine thus demonstrating the disconnect between the xth something and the "x0s". Your need to make the two ideas line up ends up with the first year being an infinite sequence of ones as it would dictate that the first decade line up with the 10s, first century with the 100s and so on.
...huh?  Under my argument, the 20th century would also incorporate 1900 to 1999, not 1901 to 2000.  That's kind of the whole point, as it's how most people already refer to said century anyway.  As I said, whatever you do with the "first year" doesn't even necessarily have to conform with the same pattern we'd use now; it can be the lone exception so that everything else fits together neatly.  As it stands, there's a fundamental disconnect between the formal calendar system and the everyday intuition of the vast majority of the population using it, because the former is fundamentally unintuitive.

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Re: Does this make any sense?
This falls somewhere in my "Top 10 Stupid Things To Argue About" List.


 

Offline BloodEagle

  • 210
  • Bleeding Paradox!
    • Steam
Re: Does this make any sense?
Is the literary analysis of The Cat in The Hat above it?

 

Offline Rodo

  • Custom tittle
  • 212
  • stargazer
    • Steam
Re: Does this make any sense?
Fortunately the world is STILL big enough for all of us, when we are left with no freespace, then we'll see what we do about our differences... maybe we'll be beaming ourselves to death in a near future.  :nod:
el hombre vicio...

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Does this make any sense?
This falls somewhere in my "Top 10 Stupid Things To Argue About" List.

Well 0th order years would make life easier for us coders. :p

I don't know why we can't say 1 BC = 0 AD and be done with it to be honest.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Re: Does this make any sense?
I'm amazed at how many people actually took this topic seriously.

Seriously.

Really. I mean it. Stop this seriousness or you might be sued... by not-not Derek Smart.

Really.  :p
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 

Offline TESLA

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 27
Re: Does this make any sense?
I'm amazed at how many people actually took this topic seriously.

Seriously.

Really. I mean it. Stop this seriousness or you might be sued... by not-not Derek Smart.

Really.  :p

I demand a fight.

Pistols at dawn!!!!
In order to find his equal, an Irishman is forced
to talk to God.

There are three types of people in this world: those who make things happen, those who watch things happen and those who wonder what happened.

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
Re: Does this make any sense?
In dealing with European history, generally when I speak about the 19th century I'm talking about 1789 to 1914 anyway.  :P

It's incorrect, but it's how it makes sense to divide the time period.  Especially if you're doing a 19th century European history class, where leaving out the French Revolution and stopping at 1900 would be nonsensical.

 

Offline Spicious

  • Master Chief John-158
  • 210
Re: Does this make any sense?

...huh?  Under my argument, the 20th century would also incorporate 1900 to 1999, not 1901 to 2000.  That's kind of the whole point, as it's how most people already refer to said century anyway. 
Your changes are purely about making things match up the way people expect them to; the logical next step is to force the 19th century to be the 1900s. Otherwise your change ends up being pointless.

I'm amazed at how many people actually took this topic seriously.

Seriously.

Really. I mean it. Stop this seriousness or you might be sued... by not-not Derek Smart.

Really.  :p
Was bored. And people seem to have adopted a "most people think it's this way so we all should" premise.

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Does this make any sense?

...huh?  Under my argument, the 20th century would also incorporate 1900 to 1999, not 1901 to 2000.  That's kind of the whole point, as it's how most people already refer to said century anyway. 
Your changes are purely about making things match up the way people expect them to; the logical next step is to force the 19th century to be the 1900s. Otherwise your change ends up being pointless.

Unfortunately, we don't call centuries "century n," or we could actually do that.  You can't have a zeroth century (it's the first century, which throws things off), but you can have a "century zero," which makes slightly more sense.  Personally, I think "nth century" sounds better than "century n."  YMMV.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Does this make any sense?

...huh?  Under my argument, the 20th century would also incorporate 1900 to 1999, not 1901 to 2000.  That's kind of the whole point, as it's how most people already refer to said century anyway. 
Your changes are purely about making things match up the way people expect them to; the logical next step is to force the 19th century to be the 1900s. Otherwise your change ends up being pointless.
People as a whole are generally familiar with the concept of the Nth century referring to the N-1 set of years; I haven't come across too many reasonably-educated adults who didn't know that we were living in the 20th century until 2000 (or 2001, if you absolutely must), or that we're living in the 21st century now.  It's essentially the same concept of your age: after you turn 20, you're in your 21st year of life, because you were in your first year of life before you turned 1.  But those same reasonably-educated people were the ones who celebrated the "new millennium" on January 1, 2000, not a year later; that's the common expectation of how decades and centuries work.  I don't see why changing this part of the official nomenclature would necessarily entail changing the other.

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
Re: Does this make any sense?
I'm amazed at how many people actually took this topic seriously.

Seriously.

Really. I mean it. Stop this seriousness or you might be sued... by not-not Derek Smart.

Really.  :p

I demand a fight.

Pistols at dawn!!!!

Meet by the old Oak tree by Sir Hayworth von Trebenshire's estate.  Last man standing! :p
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Does this make any sense?
Guys, I'm pretty sure duels are illegal.  Don't kill each other, or I'll have to sue your asses.
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
Re: Does this make any sense?
Guys, I'm pretty sure duels are illegal.  Don't kill each other, or I'll have to sue your asses.
Sue my ass!  Ha!  I give you one last chance to rescind your insult of calling me a common dandy! :p
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Does this make any sense?
HAY NUCLEAR

sue sue sue sue sue
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 
Re: Does this make any sense?
I had an idea for the perfect YouTube video to go with the topic of this thread, but unfortunately I can't find a good video of Johnnie Cochran's Chewbacca Defense from South Park on YouTube.
17:37:02   Quanto: I want to have sexual intercourse with every space elf in existence
17:37:11   SpardaSon21: even the males?
17:37:22   Quanto: its not gay if its an elf

[21:51] <@Droid803> I now realize
[21:51] <@Droid803> this will be SLIIIIIGHTLY awkward
[21:51] <@Droid803> as this rich psychic girl will now be tsundere for a loli.
[21:51] <@Droid803> OH WELLL.

See what you're missing in #WoD and #Fsquest?

[07:57:32] <Caiaphas> inspired by HerraTohtori i built a supermaneuverable plane in ksp
[07:57:43] <Caiaphas> i just killed my pilots with a high-g maneuver
[07:58:19] <Caiaphas> apparently people can't take 20 gees for 5 continuous seconds
[08:00:11] <Caiaphas> the plane however performed admirably, and only crashed because it no longer had any guidance systems

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
Re: Does this make any sense?
Ah ha!

Prepare for returned fire!
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!