Never once did I say I wanted it "nao" nor did I ever imply I wanted it "nao". I merely wanted it to be considered for future implementation. Instead myself and AoD received a massive amount of instant nay-saying from a bunch of nay-sayers. Quite frankly, it was a response not at all needed or called for, but it happened.
Well, you just have to be careful about saying that things should be easy. The fire-turret SEXP should be easy. It's not. There are many things that seem 'easy' that aren't.
Furthermore the original request (see first post) was apparently botched which didn't help matters.
I'm inclined to consider the whole thing a misunderstanding rather than anybody's fault, but you can't characterize everybody who said 'no' as a 'naysayer' - people are not going to instantly understand what you
really mean. You have to explain it.
If what you're asking for are end-user postprocessing options in the future in the context of a new graphics menu, and with the understanding that they can be overwritten by the FREDder, then I'm all for it. But it was not clear that this was what you wanted, especially given the unfortunate first post.