That's probably what I dislike most about the BP universe, the coincidence between the religious mythology of that trinity and the actual occurrences in BP universe.
Consider. Shivans were first named as such by earthlings in the first few encounters in the first great war in FS1. They *couldn't* have known anything about their nature and their relations with these other species, their importance, etc. The naming of this species was a completely different process, one in which we had to "invent" a name for them, and someone picked "shivans" because it was cool and resonated a little with the mythos.
Now, the writer decided that it would be very cool to include the other races depicted in the mythos, the Vishnans and the Brahmans. And indeed it is, but it creates the whole problem of
coincidence. Is it a pure coincidence that these new species are actually performing as an aproximate render of the human mythos, or does this imply that Hindus in BP universe were in fact
"the true religion on Earth"?
It's a problem for me, personally. When finding new things about the universe, I don't expect it to render itself into some pre-conceived almost numerological narrative that I coincidently picked when I named a certain species with a certain name 50 years ago. I expect it to be a little more surprising than that. Because otherwise, we suffer from the StarGate syndrome.
Having said that, I fully understand the writer. He had to cling on to some structure and he found that he could bring an interesting story with which he could work with.
And it's very entertaining, so I should just shut up
