this kinds thing is stupid. its like holding auto manufacturers responsible for drunk driving. granted id never actually use limewire. such programs became old skool the first time i used a torrent. but it seems wrong to me to shut down the development of a piece of software simply on the grounds that it has been abused by its users (and most likely voiding the eula in the process). also that there are a million and one other ways you can infringe copyrights and it likewise seems wrong to single one way in particular. the best way to steal movies has always been to borrow dvds and spin off a copy, why is software that lets you do this still on the market, while a general purpose file mover gets canned. windows media player has been able to rip cds for years, why has nobody sued microsoft? i dont mind the companies wanting to enforce their copyrights, but it seems there are less arbitrary and more effectual ways to accomplish this. if they shut down torrents today, someone would release another piece of software to take its place tomorrow. then you have the fact that torrent is open source, then what, a court order to destroy the codebase. sounds a lot like book burning.